Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vAHEgKKw017855 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:42:22 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eFhlc-0008Nt-Rl for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:37:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eFhlc-0008Nk-Ih for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:37:16 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eFhla-0008JF-18 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 14:37:15 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B7220A06 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:37:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3ydggB5j2Hzyms for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:37:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A0EF416.2080901@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2017 15:37:10 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <1581378296.20171117142913@chriswilson.tv> In-Reply-To: <1581378296.20171117142913@chriswilson.tv> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I think that W1VD has detected my signal some years ago. But that was not JT9-1. There have been older versions of JT9, allowing to use longer time periods, up to 30 minutes i think! That was better for LF! I am not so sure about the detection by W1VD. Maybe Jay want's to comment... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 0b2d339ae1d48966556dfb6ad64e2bce Subject: Re: LF: Trans Atlantic 2200m on JT-9? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false I think that W1VD has detected my signal some years ago. But that was not JT9-1. There have been older versions of JT9, allowing to use longer time periods, up to 30 minutes i think! That was better for LF! I am not so sure about the detection by W1VD. Maybe Jay want's to comment... 73, Stefan Am 17.11.2017 15:29, schrieb Chris Wilson: > 17 November 2017 > > > Has there been a previous trans Atlantic reception of a JT-9 signal > from the UK? > > > >