Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vA6AJW6C006377 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:19:33 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eBeQ9-00018S-PM for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 10:14:21 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eBeQ9-00018J-5P for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 10:14:21 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eBeQ6-0000FW-1t for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 10:14:19 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4CC520470 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:14:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yVpLt5yfnz10HZ for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 11:14:14 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5A0035F6.4080403@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2017 11:14:14 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f68ccfd03-c09-1dcf0@webjas-vaa134.srv.aolmail.net> <40168a26-8991-6998-e541-585a8575ad32@abelian.org> <59FDE6BD.5050606@posteo.de> <59FDEDE9.2090908@posteo.de> <1de81fc5-1f20-4dff-be22-77ef12ef5b21@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <1de81fc5-1f20-4dff-be22-77ef12ef5b21@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello Joe and Paul, Congrats to that successful TA decode! It would be interesting to see what happens if you transmit the same message to the same time again the next night. Will the SNR rise by about 3 dB? At a certain time, the message could be decodable at DL0AO. For me it is not possible to decode the message because i am also active on 8270 Hz these days. But we will make it this season, i am sure! [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: VLF: VO1NA in Todmorden on 8270 Hz - also in Amberg? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello Joe and Paul, Congrats to that successful TA decode! It would be interesting to see what happens if you transmit the same message to the same time again the next night. Will the SNR rise by about 3 dB? At a certain time, the message could be decodable at DL0AO. For me it is not possible to decode the message because i am also active on 8270 Hz these days. But we will make it this season, i am sure! 73, Stefan Am 06.11.2017 10:55, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > > Joe wrote: > > > cat msg6| > > ebnaut -et -N5 -p16K19A| > > sudo ebkey -S26 -m rp,gpio=23 -T '20171105 2300' > > Received with a couple of dB to spare. > > Copied 'DIRAC' at Eb/N0 = +1.8 dB, BER 40.5%. > Constant reference phase, list rank zero. > > Symbol error map http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/171106a.gif > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > >