Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vADKhj2S004557 for ; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 21:43:47 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eELTY-0001eB-96 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:37:00 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eELTW-0001e2-PU for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:36:58 +0000 Received: from smtp2.virginbroadband.com.au ([123.200.191.52] helo=smtp.virginbroadband.com.au) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eELTT-0008HJ-Td for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 20:36:57 +0000 Received: from [1.178.117.175] (unknown [1.178.117.175]) by smtp.virginbroadband.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48B3900E22 for ; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:36:43 +1100 (EST) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f68ccfd03-c09-1dcf0@webjas-vaa134.srv.aolmail.net> <40168a26-8991-6998-e541-585a8575ad32@abelian.org> <59FCF49B.9050703@posteo.de> <5A06DAE4.9030301@posteo.de> <5A072F91.1050406@posteo.de> <5A083D50.2080105@posteo.de> <34e5e647-caf1-6184-9ab5-9d293486994f@abelian.org> <5A085F65.3060409@posteo.de> <5A0889B1.3020701@posteo.de> <5A09B458.1040700@posteo.de> From: edgar Message-ID: <4d424ea7-6164-006b-0b5e-d8f205555a65@virginbroadband.com.au> Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 07:36:35 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5A09B458.1040700@posteo.de> Content-Language: en-AU X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Stefan, Interesting, are you aiming for a high Q coil, If so what is the best geometry for the coil for that frequency? Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: 64437c466041e93ffedda7fb96b22b71 Subject: Re: ULF: A next step for 970 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------A49F44B74768FBFE85BD423B" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------A49F44B74768FBFE85BD423B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan, Interesting, are you aiming for a high Q coil, If so what is the best geometry for the coil for that frequency? Regards, Edgar Moonah, Tasmania. --------------A49F44B74768FBFE85BD423B Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Stefan,

Interesting, are you aiming for a high Q coil, If so what is the best geometry for the coil for that frequency?

Regards, Edgar
Moonah, Tasmania.

--------------A49F44B74768FBFE85BD423B--