Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id vA6G8ic9007421 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2017 17:08:48 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1eBjpv-0002XX-O4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:01:19 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1eBjpv-0002XO-1N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:01:19 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1eBjps-0001vU-Av for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 16:01:17 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r68so14846394wmr.1 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:01:16 -0800 (PST) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KoxMkb++2D5MDZITa2zWS4vgp/64zIjm4D1xrwzn2s=; b=b7l7sX6Ax5JUHSZYzsr9geTg/aY0U73o/iDnfs+GhaZbeldDiSDx8jdJqr2JqiLZwN qlEpjqNB2ZnKmYd0jJ64DYZ0Q06Dm/8h2bbpy6Uk24QafDXdmVMLmkEhQL2M2iawbrFD Ora5Auux+3VKre0IQRikZw75WvBdUORp2oX4/dSu8jumCEOPCFNGCV/DsNnIV8R9GAx5 NK0LhpHwDMI2KPc1yqAuerTHOT/xjXhwTh7eCUh/SDr8z9EgUQ8Xv7hyba/VIK6qv0um eY/ECooVRrAzPkLcd/pHx44/gSRYhj+5xbCR2M3CBO+ViPoqbPg3OmcQv8OgciBh9C8B FPAg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/KoxMkb++2D5MDZITa2zWS4vgp/64zIjm4D1xrwzn2s=; b=mVkJDUyXkgi+NWNybbRWusohURO2h6DWDJFptpOLQ+vtklFXQCDAHay62acFATP+9o rlHKc4eWz0BFTmaUgJAtVHJcmwrqg6ZQ8U2cve2t+mn6vXxHozzEcS42P+n5ynnIK3Jc zaapQRNBpIxKHLwFzURQXuOKp2yoEffZL+tQZZBBerFT5fDFMyg//Zk8nPGd001eu7CZ x5GINi3jV1gTX/gWNcSn6gANFHxtgy78D/8Ub6Hk9dq5CTW7EyfkHYYnpcJFFG5sKrSP mD1tA8Kr+Wqa+l8YnZ+mE0ui6PcBQ/Ig090mL3cE29rnkioh6SIletybpxuEdT8Pjlk9 svbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX70qE0t/KVjvpdRqCxKnCCydZoIk7TxReDcKRtu5pmVseaZcVNE 8Gp8DuxctV29LIGhPPxpuLW04A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Q+reOsVJiDia2jeiqJGUvJMovpF26tiNvf2+HzKMQNGLsOh23eqXoj4uAFZDapCp9B2cF0YQ== X-Received: by 10.28.142.20 with SMTP id q20mr5331215wmd.37.1509984073892; Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:01:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 92sm5816131wrd.15.2017.11.06.08.01.12 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Nov 2017 08:01:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 16:01:11 +0000 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <233329225.20171106160111@gmail.com> To: DK7FC CC: dead.fets@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <5A00806B.1080504@posteo.de> References: <15f68ccfd03-c09-1dcf0@webjas-vaa134.srv.aolmail.net> <40168a26-8991-6998-e541-585a8575ad32@abelian.org> <59FCF49B.9050703@posteo.de> <59FF4368.5070904@posteo.de> <5A0064E2.9020605@posteo.de> <5A0067E5.5010009@posteo.de> <30881e9f-de97-9536-59bf-f51e0aa3498d@abelian.org> <5A00806B.1080504@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hello DK7FC, Amazing, well done guys!! Monday, November 6, 2017, 3:31:55 PM, you wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 16:14, schrieb Paul Nicholson: >> You were right about a message decode being more definitive >> than a one-pixel carrier detection. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (dead.fets[at]gmail.com) 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut message over 2877 km, DK7FC to RC4HAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=PRIORITY_NO_NAME autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hello DK7FC, Amazing, well done guys!! Monday, November 6, 2017, 3:31:55 PM, you wrote: > Am 06.11.2017 16:14, schrieb Paul Nicholson: >> You were right about a message decode being more definitive >> than a one-pixel carrier detection. > Yes, yesterday i could have said "this pixel is mine, see attachment". > But everyone would be right when having serious doubts regarding > certainty :-) > 73, Stefan > PS: I remember UA0SNV has (and is) always been a good receive station. > He got me on 137 kHz in DFCW-90 (22 mHz) and WSPR-15, several times. > Distance would be about 5750 km. Just a little farer. Maybe it is worth > to contact him... -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com