Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9IFNSRZ028679 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:23:29 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e4pz8-0000lF-Vm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:10:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e4pz7-0000l6-AH for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:10:17 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e4pz4-0005ad-Az for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:10:16 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q132so10882724wmd.2 for ; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:10:14 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=/mYCjrqU5bggQLufOFg98sDuagH5YB/wZMDiBSho7Q4=; b=eD+He0MBLYabnKXqH4cQr9O8k/9yJnmfhj8DMXqyRnA2vfBVAR51Mh3BEehMQaEqni m3pGrwidhKMeEGZiNk/JGzrmBVdFTn3uMLmx2WYvVQDc1LHutrld0dzbDxHOVa1c+2nP hnFtN23f9b/bRm5tsJsQiGk+WVhUOIU2V9lNs2T3T0pPfPxk0LQWiIVRW/Bz9iO4CFLf PyEHqK6/MqPgoc+F35PHq8yUbwgSwKSiEyXMdK98HCYMGY7vr4QY0acDfQxpPOCIHHrv UVh60+fNI0QD76UYX0ubFaC4er8AxLqzQEtQg4t9QvNB8dPL6f4VFHQfcF4qF1LFr5yt C35A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=/mYCjrqU5bggQLufOFg98sDuagH5YB/wZMDiBSho7Q4=; b=ia2cvwaMVE6rszNT9bQ5/IlL41O1z6PVDB1wrio5FK95lJ0IoJRrZBmHR4OY3h61qK ivgBKp6BwuR1EpeCECMe6ZN4vGPE1U9+kU4oGzFtnp6nUJcpsyqlEvWhdz7Aj4c0lLkO OTCYjRBRBmzBBFYGZwAmEI/Xr94EU1Z7sOlNqictb5IrKfY3UQxZJUUgTcJc8LPykGEV RanN3dJWMvMu80qhbj4fCVt0bRgRYmeI5GctdgIq60MlDVE3zmgeGlYTM3ME4vBqSjS+ tZpNu3OTuBRzlD7UDejuOFltvp3oRCUKa7YmPuCgSVuod4KIMOz19F1JAROsoeBL7WTZ achQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXnAaj1HD9xKkGEaM2oyL6+F3ZZVH4xf/yUpqY8FNocOmMEU5t+ 398hrr5MzB3tH9hla8RBUEY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Rs//AIGAThGXnEdXkBrVHu8wz1bfTL2QTeZegZM88HfibBwqiTy5Nei1JNiWmsdxr3m1MykQ== X-Received: by 10.28.16.209 with SMTP id 200mr6855074wmq.35.1508339413557; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.103] ([82.98.23.94]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 69sm13297951wmm.2.2017.10.18.08.10.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 08:10:12 -0700 (PDT) References: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk, codgers posting From: John Rabson X-Forwarded-Message-Id: Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:10:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Spam-Score: 0.3 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Can anyone help David Gibson? John F5VLF -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: efficiency of long wave transmitters Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:54:36 +0100 From: David Gibson To: Mike Bedford , Rob Gill , creg-enquiries@bcra.org.uk, C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk [...] Content analysis details: (0.3 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (john.rabson07[at]gmail.com) 0.2 FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT Envelope-from freemail username ends in digit (john.rabson07[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: bf9cd6b3d49c805062abf73a1027fea8 Subject: LF: Fwd: efficiency of long wave transmitters Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------3D0B2A2E7F9FA37E41FB3668" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,HTML_30_40, HTML_MESSAGE,HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------3D0B2A2E7F9FA37E41FB3668 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Can anyone help David Gibson? John F5VLF -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: efficiency of long wave transmitters Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:54:36 +0100 From: David Gibson To: Mike Bedford , Rob Gill , creg-enquiries@bcra.org.uk, C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk Mike, Rob, John, Chris... This is me just being lazy and trying to avoid doing a web search, or ploughing through Watt's book on VLF Engineering. Do any of you have a reference to a *definitive* statement of the transmitter efficiency of the 60kHz Anthorn transmitter and the 198kHz BBC R4 Droitwich transmitter? -- David Gibson --------------3D0B2A2E7F9FA37E41FB3668 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Can anyone help David Gibson?

John F5VLF

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: efficiency of long wave transmitters
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:54:36 +0100
From: David Gibson <david@caves.org.uk>
To: Mike Bedford <bedfordmd@aol.com>, Rob Gill <creg-editor@bcra.org.uk>, creg-enquiries@bcra.org.uk, C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk


Mike, Rob, John, Chris...

This is me just being lazy and trying to avoid doing a web search, or
ploughing through Watt's book on VLF Engineering.  Do any of you have a
reference to a *definitive* statement of the transmitter efficiency of
the 60kHz Anthorn transmitter and the 198kHz BBC R4 Droitwich transmitter?

-- 
David Gibson

--------------3D0B2A2E7F9FA37E41FB3668--