Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9GCNT0K017596 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:23:30 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e44Jq-0003e4-RO for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:16:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e44JC-0003dv-HB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:15:50 +0100 Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e44J4-0003sB-Vp for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:15:48 +0100 Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c202so24580152oih.9 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 05:15:42 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=eboO0T4CwXXnT5X0Mg4nps1lYyZKXNL2Ewgwe0UBZs8=; b=LxGklMV81LheHeJem1mDJgkO5ZBa0hCy6IG9iraT9B8R34Ede+Xm0PndBMbjXJ3tG2 l3jIQXqYPP1W+Qtzhz1GAd0en2slTR22fj9LMphN+vNFg01eVsxpx/FZVEjbpZhylAXk dF3/l0VWd7KMY0LXWFUaaP730x/tFnUQkidqOSkxoQ0UaFSI2qGcC3i343BqpJXIf3L6 MWnZp6Js9EmwALF3CQAjAd0Mc+0NxsUWjiw0GLDolbq6MSJIllaox4ai5QspVsUhK18x jgq0RN2ERBU5EpgjtGvavhYjSsoZeBBBXZT4teDd/4dBVXVbu2Gl9Q3jCCx6jOgvWQ3o hdog== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=eboO0T4CwXXnT5X0Mg4nps1lYyZKXNL2Ewgwe0UBZs8=; b=AuQscZOtPyf9dN54ziSNDdhHrGWXFAfoVR02cJ6zIuAwpwSdKiurRikKAgvtWRjKry xHLa1r4rzDRa3DccFLthzg7tvVjm+JYJtKg0bp3LRB0O0gs28QZ+LXWiOFenvPnWHW1Q B1HnZfE5bBlvIveBnBQoLyL9upARB+b075RY89fJigCOVV4nzYNwvpFnxHM8Bq7Rl0/R kwjR0bQA/gE/svB/7ZYPWnhTpUAtBj/UhLWtaaxd/OffhlKnj39UwokIOQi7PTwUklRN WZJhE2WsQUfj6EFxg2fT8Omt6SRz9zvyUYEdv4o5uGt1yWeneTCi9JYcaSGWTsCqX0lw JKdQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXe3Z55v3QATJ45F9k/YtniFP4IdG9C/++PDa4JXjwWwjkGEbzH jGORatbyx+LeD/n6jwJsHuTCybR5+arPK892j10= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RB2CGdBiS8cotfYoBwpLoRnDbuJ8KAyuQQhQz21gSz3vd37isATG+AoIyyC65aK0WgtQ4FuTB1ppYM6VIFERA= X-Received: by 10.202.171.13 with SMTP id u13mr5245748oie.391.1508156140880; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 05:15:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.1.210 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 05:15:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Roger Lapthorn Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:15:40 +0100 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Thanks Hugh. I'll probably be on 630m WSPR from early evening. If I get a chance I may try some (roll-up-able - is that a word?) radials too tonight. 73s Roger G3XBM On 16 October 2017 at 11:03, dhchurch wrote: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: f1284eec928b6c66f973fc41cf683e42 Subject: Re: Re: LF: A little better? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113cdcee0b0a7d055ba8f79e" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a113cdcee0b0a7d055ba8f79e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Thanks Hugh. I'll probably be on 630m WSPR from early evening. If I get a chance I may try some (roll-up-able - is that a word?) radials too tonight. 73s Roger G3XBM On 16 October 2017 at 11:03, dhchurch wrote: > Hello Roger > > I wasn't "on" last night but if you want someone listening as a compariso= n > please email me and normally I can run the system. > > 73, Hugh, M0DSZ > > > ----- Receiving the following content ----- > *From:* Roger Lapthorn > *Receiver:* rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > *Time:* 2017-10-15, 19:38:27 > *Subject:* Re: LF: A little better? > > Well, with 4 spots of my QRPP 630m WSPR signal already, it looks as if > things* are* better. > > On 15 October 2017 at 14:43, Roger Lapthorn > wrote: > >> My earth-electrode "antenna" for 630m has been repaired and the secondar= y >> antenna current reading on the Marconi has gone from 17uA to 22uA using >> this as an additional ground.=C2=A1=C2=A1 It remains to be seen (tonight= ) if this >> small ERP increase makes any real difference. The next thing to try will= be >> more/better grounds directly outside the shack and some radials? >> >> I shall be on 630m WSPR (20% TX) this evening and overnight. The ERP is >> still very much QRPP (low mWs). All reports welcomed. >> >> I know this is trivial compared with the results obtained by "real" >> stations, but it shows useful results can be obtained on MF with a very >> modest installation. My hope is this encourages others. >> >> Last=C2=A1=C2=A1 night my ultra simple system got 3 unique spots on TX a= nd I >> spotted 10 unique stations on RX. >> >> 73s >> Roger G3XBM >> > > --001a113cdcee0b0a7d055ba8f79e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Thanks Hugh. I'll probably be on 630m WSPR from e= arly evening. If I get a chance I may try some (roll-up-able - is that a wo= rd?) radials too tonight.

73s
Roger G3XB= M

On 1= 6 October 2017 at 11:03, dhchurch <dhchurch@lineone.net> = wrote:
Hello Roger
=C2=A0
I wasn't "on" last night but if you want someone listeni= ng as a comparison=20 please email me and normally I can run the system.
=C2=A0
73, Hugh, M0DSZ
=C2=A0
-----=20 Receiving the following content -----
Time:=20 2017-10-15, 19:38:27
Subject:=20 Re: LF: A little better?

Well, with 4 spots of my QRPP 630m WSPR signal already, = it looks=20 as if things are better.

On 15 October 2017 at 14:43, Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com> wrote:
My earth-electrode "antenna" for 630m has been repaired = and the=20 secondary antenna current reading on the Marconi has gone from 17uA to = 22uA=20 using this as an additional ground.=C2=A1=C2=A1 It remains to be seen (= tonight) if=20 this small ERP increase makes any real difference. The next thing to tr= y=20 will be more/better grounds directly outside the shack and some=20 radials?

I shall be on 630m WSPR (20% TX) this evening and overnight.= The=20 ERP is still very much QRPP (low mWs). All reports welcomed.

I know this is trivial compared with the results obtained by= =20 "real" stations, but it shows useful results can be obtained = on MF with a=20 very modest installation. My hope is this encourages others.

Last=C2=A1=C2=A1 night my ultra simple system got 3 unique s= pots on TX and=20 I spotted 10 unique stations on RX.

73s
Roger=20 G3XBM


--001a113cdcee0b0a7d055ba8f79e--