Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9HARfmJ022317 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 12:27:42 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e4Oze-0006Dr-Tz for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:21:02 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e4Ozc-0006Di-Ve for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:21:00 +0100 Received: from mail-oi0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::234]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e4Oza-0008GF-1d for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:20:59 +0100 Received: by mail-oi0-x234.google.com with SMTP id h6so1861289oia.10 for ; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 03:20:57 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qQNfqROnYbRDm2NLNCx0ynY5fzyDjXjjOa3fuqN++4M=; b=n4DTQy0gw9elmIaHfxeSudy6CUVm8N9c+TVP06jFHkkKeNEQgSXdPfYqtDj+ZDI6+c TH+kxy0BXu6LlQVYM8pw3QzNqCnnIuYwQKyVEUhlL0RU8cTVxbnRfXY6dbn163f5gwzM z7ae82530YsQr7sG3CsmnA6j5NO+SuDSX8QI4WYVF5xuEzqoae8vq/RGqKQK+39JL5wZ hw19gGTCxf0ZoZRtyXLcI24or8xAuViW2BI9G5J3iVQL3qyVRhieGY8yJDjEmt9O9PRV 5ebm8WJQjm8Iss3VdS89ZwJdnNgkqFGcTY2k5ffftwvslWaVMcBlfT+Z+PTtULMMsz7z 1FrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=qQNfqROnYbRDm2NLNCx0ynY5fzyDjXjjOa3fuqN++4M=; b=KasR8A0Uw3MwFBPLzw7td6IlLogwNpsJahgfTLm5cIbtNkS7jG6N8pOVg8gYUayHNv FvKfDk7su0H0UDLC0zJsBv/AhQi7HZHmEgHzjqdvY3MIzgwEPndakuKgSIgEEGKLj3lX /d/o9VmwMOY7t/CXTt78c4CAp0V+mVj+Pxaqw5msS2ynwNNtfurPOE8b/7aUIf3/G7HW hu598qbuQdqsA4VZKpwvRyt+37ZMvvPANPQCHjguJbAP9FCJ0MvdUaAHX0US0ggCQO/w jOsmFpkfD4fUdG20D9riyeVxqMjPW7E2SdIrcO5pl8n9R8sWQ3GAxjUTwVYdI1i2boGf iUKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaVsjVZLhv6ifCVNqbU0IO+160Bxcm9e1Vg4BUA28BChCFwJwmSy kYdCyyfL4/SMTA92dCxO+Mhyf/KMb2+8he64qQY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TW5vesKtF5wcK4g6/hSy3EJiZop6mmUCoE7MOwoF/a3hIiYnFoRNAbZp7y9wzbmbBjFlJaNpCfzPrZcxVIowE= X-Received: by 10.157.33.79 with SMTP id l15mr2330139otd.124.1508235655725; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 03:20:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.1.210 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Oct 2017 03:20:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Lapthorn Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 11:20:55 +0100 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" , rsgb_lf_group@yahoogroups.co.uk X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Overnight I was keen to see if the addition of 2 radials and an additional ground outside the shack improved my results on 630m WSPR. Well, I am not sure. You will recall my ERP is around 10mW. Overall I got spots from 10* unique* stations (my highest yet) and I spotted 10 *unique *stations. Clearly some new stations copied me, but I am not sure if this is my system or just that they have recently returned to (or just come on to) 630m. Certainly my reports of "regulars" on RX seem no better. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 739d4fb39bd02fc5a2de5437a39bb056 Subject: LF: Last night on 630m WSPR Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11428ea47f4860055bbb7ace" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a11428ea47f4860055bbb7ace Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Overnight I was keen to see if the addition of 2 radials and an additional ground outside the shack improved my results on 630m WSPR. Well, I am not sure. You will recall my ERP is around 10mW. Overall I got spots from 10* unique* stations (my highest yet) and I spotted 10 *unique *stations. Clearly some new stations copied me, but I am not sure if this is my system or just that they have recently returned to (or just come on to) 630m. Certainly my reports of "regulars" on RX seem no better. At the moment, I am doubtful of *any* improvement, although it needs a few more nights to get a better picture. 73s Roger G3XBM --001a11428ea47f4860055bbb7ace Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Overnight I was keen to see if the addition of 2 radi= als and an additional ground outside the shack improved my results on 630m = WSPR. Well, I am not sure.=C2=A0 You will recall my ERP is around 10mW.

Overall I got spots from 10 unique stations (m= y highest yet) and I spotted 10 unique stations. Clearly some new st= ations copied me, but I am not sure if this is my system or just that they = have recently returned to (or just come on to) 630m. Certainly my reports o= f "regulars" on RX seem no better.

At t= he moment, I am doubtful of any improvement, although it needs a few= more nights to get a better picture.

73s
Roger G3XBM
--001a11428ea47f4860055bbb7ace--