MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 17:51:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHAQVWND1eR74k7qtWUg9uhrR4ONpKfaJTCxPwRrTo=Jkkk5ow@mail.gmail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: LF: 630m WSPR QRPP
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1136e61c0a6bb2055bacd13d"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org

--001a1136e61c0a6bb2055bacd13d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

Well, I have now strung a couple of radials across the grass and connected
an(additional) ground outside the shack. Interestingly, the antenna current
is no higher - I was expecting this to read higher on the antenna current
meter when optimally matched - although reports from M0DSZ (232km) do seem
a few dBs higher. This could, of course, just be the time or conditions.

Any reports this evening and overnight would be appreciated.

I briefly called CQ on FT8, but copied no-one.

My ERP is still very low milliwatts, if the antenna current is to be
believed.

73s
Roger G3XBM

--001a1136e61c0a6bb2055bacd13d
Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>Well, I have now strung a couple of radials across th=
e grass and connected an(additional) ground outside the shack. Interestingl=
y, the antenna current is no higher - I was expecting this to read higher o=
n the antenna current meter when optimally matched - although reports from =
M0DSZ (232km) do seem a few dBs higher. This could, of course, just be the =
time or conditions.</div><div><br></div><div>Any reports this evening and o=
vernight would be appreciated.</div><div><br></div><div>I briefly called CQ=
 on FT8, but copied no-one.</div><div><br></div><div>My ERP is still very l=
ow milliwatts, if the antenna current is to be believed.</div><div><br></di=
v><div>73s</div><div>Roger G3XBM</div></div>

--001a1136e61c0a6bb2055bacd13d--