Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9GKnPZu019346 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 22:49:26 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e4CEh-0004yk-S2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:43:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e4CEc-0004yb-I4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:43:38 +0100 Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e4CEZ-0005vC-KC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:43:37 +0100 Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v132so27261811oie.1 for ; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:43:35 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MwgpWks9k5R0D3U6uXeUv99UvouQBm0pK7SZaxEfBH4=; b=HfyJ4yf9X4rLEizBxveKpABJs5FSBQLYB4xNsJhsz11VJoMjhw+SMBaPblv6gcjPBB vBm3Vg7gdECIq0jb3kIwkyiiD0GvujiGtJCrNBc8YVGYgxxb6EdjxqhJ6eXTimSBPa3l NBU+hwVt/8iJnnCHn3Cm7YDnbhcvypNmAS53cpIkn7H8HTi1MdViODFaSdSJIt98sPfk /KtyMvgW1atCNNv9lGRy5wVdkfoj83oej7THyzoLxP8NZVmnzeafEXonT+TU83HmJ56N nE6CRQ8pGZMcycxqnyP7CjhMjaoY19G73eoE51J6Vz2BF4Us7SPbZyE6xRFYqsBSC/7s omSw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=MwgpWks9k5R0D3U6uXeUv99UvouQBm0pK7SZaxEfBH4=; b=X56zxhI/tK858S5fv/czpa4O63tl3IhWAp7A2EV2CMprzI18IyZMqRvSNZMkMRZUPO yFPAoTQaXHN2Y0PViY+nR/xN+iOVQ7Uwxf3J0BgwzUBCOW4vjqovItoYe2ci/C5BhBmC 5tnO9avrpM73LPctCnlffDpRb9EdWE4XisSuC+necm7EdHX0/BA31LzD3PDczxMSxwYX WO2MfXSVj6I4ZE44oqdxgin3Vw8cJPxEsEuxrP4Bl7obMn6ROqYp6Daqo6z914KP4Vde QQkhebHlbNjgTOu02CoB8HE0paNT/m3RjdmC8d8gnuW8ECRBPIS8D/F3LWrV4X8dpwGz bQ2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaW+hJPj9d3h2f5Gd3kDBZ3uodQvUEtGBqEcQDPiv+PVAdb+hzoX 5yUlBrGD4tJ52Xoy8KGNAp8FfMStkeJO+q6K/YE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+TTHfOmMLY/FfEEr9DNrgVTmuWIqAvKiZ7le/1bfY85oES56IpzHT09poN/EbBhiv0c+DKjkTrVDkuL/ThRYHg= X-Received: by 10.157.35.11 with SMTP id j11mr1007174otb.167.1508186613399; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:43:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.1.210 with HTTP; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:43:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Lapthorn Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 21:43:32 +0100 Message-ID: To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Well, my new tests this evening are hardly likely to shatter long-held scientific theories, however to me they are "interesting". Comparing the reports given to G8HUH and LA8AV over the last few weeks suggests little real improvement. From this I conclude: [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (rogerlapthorn[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: fc152e7304849b9a177649b85aea9f41 Subject: LF: 630m WSPR Experiments Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140f3c658c42d055bb00f9d" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE, TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --001a1140f3c658c42d055bb00f9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Well, my new tests this evening are hardly likely to shatter long-held scientific theories, however to me they are "interesting". Comparing the reports given to G8HUH and LA8AV over the last few weeks suggests little real improvement. From this I conclude: - The mains earth is actually quite effective. Radials didn't seem to improve my results much, if at all. - I need to get a better antenna in the air. My "compromise" antenna is really a compromise - OK to play with, but little different from my earth-electrode "antenna". If I want to take the band seriously I need a serious antenna. Sadly, I am wobbly on ladders these days! - Useful results can be obtained on 630m WSPR with a VERY basic set-up. Thanks for the reports so far. Keep them coming as this is far from a good scientific test. 73s Roger G3XBM --001a1140f3c658c42d055bb00f9d Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, my new tests this evening are hardly likely to = shatter long-held scientific theories, however to me they are "interes= ting".

Comparing the reports given to G8HUH a= nd LA8AV over the last few weeks suggests little real improvement. From thi= s I conclude:
  • The mains earth is actually quite effective. Rad= ials didn't seem to improve my results much, if at all.
  • I need = to get a better antenna in the air. My "compromise" antenna is re= ally a compromise - OK to play with, but little different from my earth-ele= ctrode "antenna". If I want to take the band seriously I need a s= erious antenna. Sadly, I am wobbly on ladders these days!
  • Useful re= sults can be obtained on 630m WSPR with a VERY basic set-up.
= Thanks for the reports so far. Keep them coming as this is far from a good = scientific test.

73s
Roger G3XBM
--001a1140f3c658c42d055bb00f9d--