Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9RGX9eC031105 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:33:11 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e87Rd-00086M-Cm for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:25:17 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e87Rc-00086D-L4 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:25:16 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e87RZ-00077k-S0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 17:25:15 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15EE620E04 for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:25:10 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yNq3S4YcFz101F for ; Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:25:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59F35DE1.9060503@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 18:25:05 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f5559fe36-c0b-25e91@webjas-vac031.srv.aolmail.net> <59F1F06C.6070805@posteo.de> <4c256fa8-678f-9017-19c6-b196247de591@abelian.org> <59F31E5A.5020602@posteo.de> <59F33967.9030805@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <59F33967.9030805@posteo.de> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Carriers stopped at 16:20 UTC.... 73, Stefan Am 27.10.2017 15:49, schrieb DK7FC: > Hi Paul, > > Since 13:20 UTC im running 120 mA on 3 individual frequencies: > > 5090.005 Hz | 5130.005 Hz | 5170.005 Hz > > The phase and current of each carrier is individually hold constant. > > It is a sponatneous ideo to do that. Hopefully your RX is available in > the moment. I will announce the end of the transmission later. Maybe > with 3 hours you can find 3 peaks beeing significantly stronger than > the noise background. It would be interesting to see if there are > significant differences in the signal strength on our path... > > 73, Stefan > [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: VLF: 3 carriers near 5170 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Carriers stopped at 16:20 UTC.... 73, Stefan Am 27.10.2017 15:49, schrieb DK7FC: > Hi Paul, > > Since 13:20 UTC im running 120 mA on 3 individual frequencies: > > 5090.005 Hz | 5130.005 Hz | 5170.005 Hz > > The phase and current of each carrier is individually hold constant. > > It is a sponatneous ideo to do that. Hopefully your RX is available in > the moment. I will announce the end of the transmission later. Maybe > with 3 hours you can find 3 peaks beeing significantly stronger than > the noise background. It would be interesting to see if there are > significant differences in the signal strength on our path... > > 73, Stefan >