Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9QEZKlF027129 for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:35:23 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e7j6Y-0008UK-U2 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:25:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e7j6X-0008U8-Re for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:25:53 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e7j6V-0000PR-4s for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 15:25:52 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBFD0209AB for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:25:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3yN8SD5ZzBz108w for ; Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:25:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59F1F06C.6070805@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 16:25:48 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15f5559fe36-c0b-25e91@webjas-vac031.srv.aolmail.net> In-Reply-To: <15f5559fe36-c0b-25e91@webjas-vac031.srv.aolmail.net> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Paul, What abbut your new E field RX, is is ready and calibrated now? Currently there are no transmissions lanned for the next days so we could fill that gap by doing the 100 character message here on 58 km. Should take 4...5 days. What is better, day or night? And what is the SNR difference on our path? I would prefer the nights, as long as the SNR is not worese than 3 dB relative to the days... [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: VLF: 300 mA on 5170 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Paul, What abbut your new E field RX, is is ready and calibrated now? Currently there are no transmissions lanned for the next days so we could fill that gap by doing the 100 character message here on 58 km. Should take 4...5 days. What is better, day or night? And what is the SNR difference on our path? I would prefer the nights, as long as the SNR is not worese than 3 dB relative to the days... 73, Stefan