Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v958MUl7006562 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:22:32 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e01Le-0006XG-O7 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:17:38 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e01Le-0006X7-B2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:17:38 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e01La-0001r4-OK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 05 Oct 2017 09:17:37 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69CB920CAD for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:17:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3y75Gz1V6Tz1052 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:17:30 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59D5EA99.3090607@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:17:29 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ec7c794b3-bff-66@webjas-vac136.srv.aolmail.net> <59D2BD65.4080909@posteo.de> <59D4B109.27652.1415B4FA@mike.dennison.ntlworld.com> <7737095b-edc9-8b5f-ebf5-2a6b2884d425@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Am 05.10.2017 09:16, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Day 4th: -23.26 dB in 1Hz, phase 102.0 deg Ehm, that is strange. Because i have not been on air yesterday in daytime. I stopped the carrier at 7 UTC. See my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html What happened?? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: VLF: 300 mA on 6470 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Am 05.10.2017 09:16, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Day 4th: -23.26 dB in 1Hz, phase 102.0 deg Ehm, that is strange. Because i have not been on air yesterday in daytime. I stopped the carrier at 7 UTC. See my grabber http://www.iup.uni-heidelberg.de/schaefer_vlf/DK7FC_VLF_Grabber2.html What happened?? > > f = 6470.005000 Hz > > Start time: 04.October.2017 17:00:00 UTC > > Symbol period: 240 s > > Characters: 1 > > CRC bits: 0 > > Coding 8K19A > > Got a strong decode: > > carrier Eb/N0: 7.9 dB > carrier S/N: -31.16 dB in 1Hz, -65.14 dB in 2.5kHz > phase: -157.3 > > Not sure why the phase is completely different to that of the > recent carrier measurements. Miracles! I'm excited. Maybe we should forcus a bit more on the 46 km band :-) Hurray! 73, Stefan