Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v9KE9Pvq004406 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:09:27 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1e5Xtj-0005VB-WF for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:03:40 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1e5Xtj-0005V2-Kj for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:03:39 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e5Xtc-0006l8-DT for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:03:38 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x230.google.com with SMTP id b189so22011112wmd.4 for ; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:03:32 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ImhPlZaHU2rfi6ZnjN/wjPnx+A7qoaRsOJLMGYS4m5o=; b=iKNMMavbw+PtAzSdFzczjf4JBP/ReX4dIq6IqivqTNP9AqXEx189At+vmyb57NCm+n hjCpCj8P9Y+3x4EIpLNS24Fv9zLKFvvXPns6x3SsA2t5axLC21zpoU6Jb/8G2u9awulr 6yCWjTYRFV+POOxOuBFCYoTQ4l/BgAxoD/E3mdCCaht3gorQk7a6sT7sPCNFGLPvLDVt 8zbyMEH380uGThoKw7cW7+wCs3m73AL5y8zvR6/13CBsfedOMSPJ09rjjNAHHIoXkjLt v7s9GCTkvicE2YLSvtikqbt7holiFZlQ1XcCluxbBYV2uadLjLvTMbDkszJRKaowscKV uEkw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language; bh=ImhPlZaHU2rfi6ZnjN/wjPnx+A7qoaRsOJLMGYS4m5o=; b=sDIZZnQ34u9AQIKz7GrDIiUUkmqU33GVBWJwub9TUiDt1x+vNSQ3hzGTFVHGCCEYh0 aUbIK7gpfrORyWNhsWX1+dcJeraKFi7jOwH8BB6ADwb2sf8CcWaFNH8gYwe6OfsoeIiA MK6DK27+KUO7xOU58XbCB1UbaumpHUfRzW8XUsaLWhQOFzTkgl7L7V6tlrmFS3ZbDbo/ wT300a0Gv5r62zzAWjhTEGUDCFbXHBLtTjuYARAVyzMhDUAaNm/3HHNFNWhsJToy27ts Nw/7Nr+/KQNtM1uqwedTZohF9dXia+woLFCG/4cAm0QBw55QPxZ1SV5QrIueAiakAo1I kamA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaX+ql/XjpMtwj76aJnOvFCds/ZD7V0lXxcvFMoozBcEM7Xpp2Fb dIq4b7Byo8JFGCWGrluj5cq65A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SsQdSJOGoz0YgHj+WecZ+JG/3cQ8setvGaVvfAvw9G1pcCeJ1mZxssrkzczBd8LizqisiqJg== X-Received: by 10.80.149.6 with SMTP id u6mr6632894eda.137.1508508211229; Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:03:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([192.175.41.34]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s6sm1235931edc.2.2017.10.20.07.03.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 20 Oct 2017 07:03:30 -0700 (PDT) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: From: Ian Marsh Message-ID: <50fb2ef9-1067-a98e-ad97-502072300286@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 15:03:29 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: I'm told that the Anthorn Tx runs 50 KW RF output to a 'T' antenna with a radiated power of 17 KW. Unfortunately, I'm not sure of the height of the supporting antenna masts but Wikipedia says that they are 227 metres (745 ft) tall. [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (ian.g4exd[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: c95b9a52470b89d54f2ef38e923e05cb Subject: Re: LF: Fwd: efficiency of long wave transmitters Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------53218370FB22FADF8AB56DEF" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.9 required=5.0 tests=HTML_30_40,HTML_MESSAGE, HTML_TAG_EXISTS_TBODY autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------53218370FB22FADF8AB56DEF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm told that the Anthorn Tx runs 50 KW RF output to a 'T' antenna with a radiated power of 17 KW. Unfortunately, I'm not sure of the height of the supporting antenna masts but Wikipedia says that they are 227 metres (745 ft) tall. Hope that helps. Ian G4EXD On 18/10/2017 16:10, John Rabson wrote: > > Can anyone help David Gibson? > > John F5VLF > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: efficiency of long wave transmitters > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:54:36 +0100 > From: David Gibson > To: Mike Bedford , Rob Gill > , creg-enquiries@bcra.org.uk, > C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk > > > > Mike, Rob, John, Chris... > > This is me just being lazy and trying to avoid doing a web search, or > ploughing through Watt's book on VLF Engineering. Do any of you have a > reference to a *definitive* statement of the transmitter efficiency of > the 60kHz Anthorn transmitter and the 198kHz BBC R4 Droitwich transmitter? > > -- > David Gibson > --------------53218370FB22FADF8AB56DEF Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm told that the Anthorn Tx runs 50 KW RF output to a 'T' antenna with a radiated power of 17 KW. Unfortunately, I'm not sure of the height of the supporting antenna masts but Wikipedia says that they are 227 metres (745 ft) tall.

Hope that helps.

Ian G4EXD

On 18/10/2017 16:10, John Rabson wrote:

Can anyone help David Gibson?

John F5VLF

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: efficiency of long wave transmitters
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 13:54:36 +0100
From: David Gibson <david@caves.org.uk>
To: Mike Bedford <bedfordmd@aol.com>, Rob Gill <creg-editor@bcra.org.uk>, creg-enquiries@bcra.org.uk, C.Trayner@leeds.ac.uk


Mike, Rob, John, Chris...

This is me just being lazy and trying to avoid doing a web search, or
ploughing through Watt's book on VLF Engineering.  Do any of you have a
reference to a *definitive* statement of the transmitter efficiency of
the 60kHz Anthorn transmitter and the 198kHz BBC R4 Droitwich transmitter?

-- 
David Gibson


--------------53218370FB22FADF8AB56DEF--