Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v8NBGL0H001171 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 13:16:22 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dviLz-0004yx-Qn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:12:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dviLz-0004yo-59 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:12:11 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22c]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dviLw-0001um-9v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:12:09 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id m127so9272977wmm.3 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 04:12:07 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=bmxiEjlFHbpmcVkj5tOO8GKiR0W3CBvubIOPp/JkjKE=; b=koXX/G6pAJu59RE413PfoeUjrC7uag0o0qm3bA0erIrK2ewoPq3PfT6yE1i7T0mH1B axLSmvbhFZIuiJNqJHP3f4b1WiQ5om5QonXV+d4R3izycSHnPHSpIaQhMbkZ4RwVXQWP awo8vX3OtvYdWvDvVj8OGB9fgDMbz0c4HjgdE7hExVFm+w/DuGAnyRBaGcYBbrWzLL7A NoR49goY0wSLBuO6YS2+vdIualOi4f37tTDSIGl5Kn3R1zqVKlchqqmgS4fts8CAZbZR WsqH/AMdN51ll/9CK/kspOlDzU/GAJnLB1QFYngbkOZDlwhr6qk9WD39xTRjPc21hdAs 541g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=bmxiEjlFHbpmcVkj5tOO8GKiR0W3CBvubIOPp/JkjKE=; b=llSS5ZNVdWNf+/v3GncQHzyXFx0R4huQnWYUIP5zw2l0iuNwRkonDACO3afT+1ygwF 9cN9fvE999febA5aA5Jyk27fG/VWtnFpQZhwGkjgEGOvYY7CRYS9FFjEH7tulQULKPqe FaTrww3KYn5PJ/k5/1pdvCHGrbRpwiRqUFO2+G+KWB6c5vWR3aC5ffLW24dPNFv2HggQ C7S+EIEwGIIDrD6FBpPfys7V0kx7BW83FHZv4NUxM3Si1NI4nVyjrXpRXa5HwtR86sHk 9BUsWIT9CEjvhml7IVEngQ3ilRNNcYgUGZL6ZfeJPJTubvvydc2gtESJUCkCYGWk3nOM L/8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiMRz4rgUiI8WT90WAyQewkWODGSCOUo6gK+srzCMGvGarwFvxN aYjupL/BDIdLmKlDClaL17kj/j+wSll8cVqxpT8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QBH2iYjs7d77ue9wRgewLzKBqLF4a6D3N9EQkOavQCO8khHGe/iJzmEZb/oy7sC3fhj+6dEs6Z7ccyXRSK4JXM= X-Received: by 10.80.170.143 with SMTP id q15mr8068491edc.289.1506165126860; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 04:12:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.80.129.226 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 04:12:06 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <59C63EC4.12309.B636CA@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AA1E057@servigilant.vigilant.local> <59C5428F.17051.114F75@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <59C63EC4.12309.B636CA@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> From: Andy Talbot Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 12:12:06 +0100 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: WSPR works with a noise bandwidth of 1.46Hz, and by virtue of the strong FEC, allows copy at a S/N *IN THAT BANDWIDTH *of about +4dB. This equates to -24dB S/N in 2.5kHz 10WPM morse has a noise bandwith of about 8Hz, and as you are only using audible / visual human interpretation needs probably a S/N of perhaps +6dB to +10dB depending on the operator's experience to decode perfectly. That equates to about -20dB S/N in 2500Hz best case [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider (andy.g4jnt[at]gmail.com) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Scan-Signature: 69d86b33142413363dd56bd312139bf4 Subject: Re: LF: CW 477.7 kHz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0ef9b05c126b0559d9652c" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false --94eb2c0ef9b05c126b0559d9652c Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" WSPR works with a noise bandwidth of 1.46Hz, and by virtue of the strong FEC, allows copy at a S/N *IN THAT BANDWIDTH *of about +4dB. This equates to -24dB S/N in 2.5kHz 10WPM morse has a noise bandwith of about 8Hz, and as you are only using audible / visual human interpretation needs probably a S/N of perhaps +6dB to +10dB depending on the operator's experience to decode perfectly. That equates to about -20dB S/N in 2500Hz best case So 10WPM CW is going to be at least 4dB worse, and possibly as much as 10dB if operator experience is lower. Andy G4JNT On 23 September 2017 at 12:00, Roelof Bakker wrote: > Hello Joe, > > The signal was much better last night. > I have attached an audio clip. > > This is made with Linrad using a 10 Hz wide filter. > The keying sidebands are well within the filter passband. > > I believe slow Morse, say 10 WPM, received with a 10 Hz filter will > achieve about the same signal to noise ratio as WSPR. In this case > this is 24 dB compared to a 2500 Hz SSB bandwidth. > > 73, > Roelof, pa0rdt > > The following section of this message contains a file attachment > prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format. > If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system, > you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer. > If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance. > > ---- File information ----------- > File: VO1NA20170923.mp3 > Date: 23 Sep 2017, 12:51 > Size: 248256 bytes. > Type: Unknown > > --94eb2c0ef9b05c126b0559d9652c Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
WSPR works with a noise bandwidth of 1.46Hz, and by virtue= of the strong FEC, allows copy at a S/N IN THAT BANDWIDTH =C2=A0of = about +4dB. =C2=A0 =C2=A0This equates to -24dB S/N in 2.5kHz

=
10WPM morse has a noise bandwith of about 8Hz, and as you are only usi= ng audible / visual human interpretation needs probably a S/N of perhaps +6= dB to +10dB depending on the operator's experience to decode perfectly.= =C2=A0 =C2=A0That equates to about -20dB S/N in 2500Hz best case

So 10WPM CW is going to be at least 4dB worse, and possibly= as much as 10dB =C2=A0if operator experience is lower.

Andy =C2=A0G4JNT


On 23 September 2017 at 12:00, Roelof Bakker <roelo= f@ndb.demon.nl> wrote:
Hell= o Joe,

The signal was much better last night.
I have attached an audio clip.

This is made with Linrad using a 10 Hz wide filter.
The keying sidebands are well within the filter passband.

I believe slow Morse, say 10 WPM, received with a 10 Hz filter will
achieve about the same signal to noise ratio as WSPR. In this case
this is 24 dB compared to a 2500 Hz SSB bandwidth.

73,
Roelof, pa0rdt

The following section of this message contains a file attachment
prepared for transmission using the Internet MIME message format.
If you are using Pegasus Mail, or any other MIME-compliant system,
you should be able to save it or view it from within your mailer.
If you cannot, please ask your system administrator for assistance.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0---- File information -----------
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0File:=C2=A0 VO1NA20170923.mp3
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Date:=C2=A0 23 Sep 2017, 12:51
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Size:=C2=A0 248256 bytes.
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0Type:=C2=A0 Unknown


--94eb2c0ef9b05c126b0559d9652c--