Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v8S9BG63023683 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 11:11:19 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dxUci-0006qs-WE for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:56:48 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dxUcb-0006qj-8r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:56:41 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dxUcY-00084x-DS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 09:56:39 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9E2420B9C for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:56:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3y2pTD1L5Gz10HX for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:56:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59CCB938.7030601@posteo.de> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:56:24 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ea03edd54-c07-2a33b@webjas-vab251.srv.aolmail.net> <59C2C034.3070609@posteo.de> <59C428C3.7030709@posteo.de> <59C9816E.4050409@posteo.de> <6e7bcad1-06db-f5e4-f5fc-a5bc7cb4be45@abelian.org> <59CACE35.2010302@posteo.de> <9c8dcd9b-26d6-1be2-cd16-b9482d0aeaaa@abelian.org> <59CB9ADE.5030201@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Jacek, Yes, sure. Like i did 2 weeks ago on 8270 Hz with the larger coil. I could also do something at night, experimental 1 character messages and so on. Maybe we are already in a range (920 km) where the night time SNR is as good or better than the day time signal? At least this was the case with RN3AUS in the last season. It will also depend on the band we are using. [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: f62c7cf8eeb8e5a327b71719e9bffff1 Subject: Re: VLF: 300 mA on 8270 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Jacek, Yes, sure. Like i did 2 weeks ago on 8270 Hz with the larger coil. I could also do something at night, experimental 1 character messages and so on. Maybe we are already in a range (920 km) where the night time SNR is as good or better than the day time signal? At least this was the case with RN3AUS in the last season. It will also depend on the band we are using. Let's just see. But be prepared, next week the next step downwards will be done. 73, Stefan Am 27.09.2017 19:17, schrieb Jacek Lipkowski: > Stefan, > > could you also send carriers during your experiments? i understand > that changing bands requires a trip to the roof, so maybe you could > send a 1 day carrier after changing the band. you could use it to see > if the tuning and tx is ok, and we would have a chance to test our > receivers. > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > >