Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v8RCfO0x020456 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:41:27 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dxBYh-0005EF-CU for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:35:23 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dxBY6-0005E2-36 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:34:46 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dxBY1-0004Xv-Bi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 13:34:42 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCD2D20A02 for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:34:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3y2HML6MRnz100c for ; Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:34:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59CB9ADE.5030201@posteo.de> Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 14:34:38 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ea03edd54-c07-2a33b@webjas-vab251.srv.aolmail.net> <59C2C034.3070609@posteo.de> <59C428C3.7030709@posteo.de> <59C9816E.4050409@posteo.de> <6e7bcad1-06db-f5e4-f5fc-a5bc7cb4be45@abelian.org> <59CACE35.2010302@posteo.de> <9c8dcd9b-26d6-1be2-cd16-b9482d0aeaaa@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <9c8dcd9b-26d6-1be2-cd16-b9482d0aeaaa@abelian.org> X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Paul, Thanks for the 5th day. Am 27.09.2017 14:15, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Ok, but the lower bands will need many days because E-field is > not useable. It will take some days until we completed the experiments on 6.47 kHz. At least 2 weeks. How long will it take until your E field RX is fully operative again? [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Scan-Signature: cc2e5baae40f8f7a09b47e6877ef0bfb Subject: Re: VLF: 300 mA on 8270 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Hi Paul, Thanks for the 5th day. Am 27.09.2017 14:15, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Ok, but the lower bands will need many days because E-field is > not useable. It will take some days until we completed the experiments on 6.47 kHz. At least 2 weeks. How long will it take until your E field RX is fully operative again? 73, Stefan