Return-Path: Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by klubnl.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v8OJtbtJ008021 for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:55:39 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dwCof-0000gT-9i for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 20:43:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dwCoe-0000gK-5N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 20:43:48 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dwCob-000349-3e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 20:43:46 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67097208CA for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:43:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3y0d1n2sBxz108f for ; Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:43:41 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59C80AEC.2000509@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 24 Sep 2017 21:43:40 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ea03edd54-c07-2a33b@webjas-vab251.srv.aolmail.net> <59C2C034.3070609@posteo.de> <59C428C3.7030709@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AA21EE2@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<59C63F96.9040406@posteo.de> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AA226F9@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB9AA226F9@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "relay1.thorcom.net", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Luis, Thanks for the informative answer. IM98xn, a nice location! Can you tell the locator more detailed? :-) Well, a 1m probe, a 6m pole on the top of a house, that should work very well. The QRM comes and goes. If you have the time and fun you could drive on a hill where no QRM is present. Then use a notebook and SpecLab and record one or two hours and produce a nice spectrogram. Just to see that the RX is working well. Maybe when the Alphas are back. Or maybe the QRM is coming from a local coupling path / contaminated earth? [...] Content analysis details: (0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-Scan-Signature: da9a90c67b7e22f6718c156d8d99c1a4 Subject: Re: LF: RE: 300 mA on 8270 Hz Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000003010802050100090601" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on post.thorcom.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_20_30,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.63 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000003010802050100090601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, Thanks for the informative answer. IM98xn, a nice location! Can you tell the locator more detailed? :-) Well, a 1m probe, a 6m pole on the top of a house, that should work very well. The QRM comes and goes. If you have the time and fun you could drive on a hill where no QRM is present. Then use a notebook and SpecLab and record one or two hours and produce a nice spectrogram. Just to see that the RX is working well. Maybe when the Alphas are back. Or maybe the QRM is coming from a local coupling path / contaminated earth? 73, Stefan Am 24.09.2017 16:17, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > Hi Stefan, VLF > > Yes. I agree there is work to be made reducing the noise picked by the > antenna. Or directly looking for > an alternative Rx site which less noise > > The VLF Rx is already running at my remote Rx location at 7Km from > Benidorm. But it is a populated area > with close neighbours, street lights, etc. The probe is on top of the > roof in a 6m pole. Last 1m section made > with PVC pipe. The location is IM98xn, close to the sea and not very high. > > The antenna probe is 1m alu rod 10mm diameter. The MiniWhip is also > attached to the last 1m PVC pole > https://www.dropbox.com/s/1th9zu3neujbn1l/IMG_20170521_173617.jpg?dl=0 > > I'm using one of your designs, with separated front end right at the > probe and the rest down in the shack > using about 20m 75Ohm TV coax. The details can be found at G3XBM site > (fully recommended) > https://sites.google.com/site/sub9khz/antennas > > Will be hard to reduce the noise at this site. So the "B plan" is to > build a new E probe and use an spare PC > to setup a new receiver. I will test this in different locations I can > "borrow" and find if it works in any of them > > But first in my "To-Do" list is VLF. I'm almost ready to go with 100w > just needing some more work > > Keep tuned ! ;-) > > 73 de Luis > EA5DOM --------------000003010802050100090601 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis,

Thanks for the informative answer.
IM98xn, a nice location! Can you tell the locator more detailed? :-)
Well, a 1m probe, a 6m pole on the top of a house, that should work very well.
The QRM comes and goes.
If you have the time and fun you could drive on a hill where no QRM is present. Then use a notebook and SpecLab and record one or two hours and produce a nice spectrogram. Just to see that the RX is working well. Maybe when the Alphas are back.
Or maybe the QRM is coming from a local coupling path / contaminated earth?

73, Stefan

Am 24.09.2017 16:17, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
Hi Stefan, VLF

Yes. I agree there is work to be made reducing the noise picked by the antenna. Or directly looking for
an alternative Rx site which less noise

The VLF Rx is already running at my remote Rx location at 7Km from Benidorm. But it is a populated area
with close neighbours, street lights, etc. The probe is on top of the roof in a 6m pole. Last 1m section made
with PVC pipe. The location is IM98xn, close to the sea and not very high.

The antenna probe is 1m alu rod 10mm diameter. The MiniWhip is also attached to the last 1m PVC pole

I'm using one of your designs, with separated front end right at the probe and the rest down in the shack
using about 20m 75Ohm TV coax. The details can be found at G3XBM site (fully recommended)

Will be hard to reduce the noise at this site. So the "B plan" is to build a new E probe and use an spare PC
to setup a new receiver. I will test this in different locations I can "borrow" and find if it works in any of them

But first in my "To-Do" list is VLF. I'm almost ready to go with 100w just needing some more work

Keep tuned ! ;-)

73 de Luis
EA5DOM
--------------000003010802050100090601--