Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 17:52:31 -0230 (NDT)
From: jcraig@mun.ca
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
In-Reply-To: <000001d31c2f$198c1d90$4ca458b0$@comcast.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1708241749560.30420@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
References: <CAMFjj71=Rmckh0cB6wWHwhAsFy6em38epYpQ3wYKxfL5y4Yoig@mail.gmail.com>
 <04ba01d2fe36$1deb1380$59c13a80$@comcast.net> <041664b9-6936-16e0-07d2-f5bada648319@df3lp.de>
 <060e01d3195a$88781b00$99685100$@comcast.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1708201400020.15293@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
 <068f01d31a2a$33dd8320$9b988960$@comcast.net> <Pine.LNX.4.64.1708220707440.22383@plato.ucs.mun.ca>
 <000001d31c2f$198c1d90$4ca458b0$@comcast.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: RE: LF: RE: Re: Eclipse Experiment
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

Hi Jim,

I can only guess that a longer integration time may help.  The aerial
does not radiate well to the west though there have been QRSS60 detections
in the US.  This uses integration times of oder 10 seconds I think.

Thanks
Joe

On Wed, 23 Aug 2017, hvanesce@comcast.net wrote:

> Hello Joe,
>
> Data from some key eclipse receivers is being processed; using data from
> good receivers in Kansas and Delaware, analysts did not find your 18:00 UT
> 137.777 kHz signal on their first try using 1-second integration time; could
> you recommend a better integration time for those two receiver locations?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of jcraig@mun.ca
> Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2017 5:39 AM
> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
> Subject: RE: LF: RE: Re: Eclipse Experiment
>
> My pleasure, Jim.
> The carrier was switched off at 0935 this morning.
>
> 73
> Joe VO1NA
>
> On Sun, 20 Aug 2017, hvanesce@comcast.net wrote:
>
>> Thanks Joe,
>>
>> Lots of receivers listening.
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> Jim AA5BW
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of jcraig@mun.ca
>> Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 12:34 PM
>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>> Subject: Re: LF: RE: Re: Eclipse Experiment
>>
>> Transmitting a carrier on 137.777 kHz +- a few ppb 4 Amps to the
>> 10x100m RL for the next 1.5 days or until something fails.
>>
>> 73
>> Joe VO1NA
>>
>> On Sat, 19 Aug 2017, hvanesce@comcast.net wrote:
>>
>>> Unofficial EclipseMob update:
>>>
>>> Dixon will warm up starting ~ 06:45 Pacific Time, ramping ERP to ~
>>> 1-2 kW
>> at 55.500 kHz and ~ 3-4 kW at 135.950 kHz by 07:30 Pacific Time,
>> broadcasting MSK 101010..., until one or two hours after East Coast
>> totality.
>>> Dixon frequency may wander slightly.
>>> Comparing Dixon signal to WWVB signal could be interesting.
>>>
>>> Dixon 55.500 kHz signal field strength could be ~ 40 fT in Forest, VA
>>>
>>> A 137 kHz signal from VO1NA, or Warren, or an LF or VLF signal from
>>> W4DEX
>> might be captured and saved by a record number of receivers, and put
>> to good use.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>>
>>> Jim AA5BW
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>>> [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of Peter
>>> Sent: Sunday, July 16, 2017 1:00 PM
>>> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
>>> Subject: LF: Re: Eclipse Experiment
>>>
>>> Hi Jim et al.
>>>
>>> On 16.07.2017 15:18, Jim wrote:
>>>> ...
>>>>  (b) any before/during/after data from stable receivers ...
>>>
>>> There is a slight chance to observe effects via the propagation paths
>>> from
>> NAU, NAA or NML to Europe. Especially NAU looks promising since the
>> C-flare from 2017-07-15, ~1940 utc, could be observed quite well here.
>>> http://lf-radio.de/cgi-bin/test/plot_channel.cgi?date=17-07-15&freq=4
>>> 0
>>> .7KHz
>>>
>>> Good luck to all EclipseMob members!
>>>
>>> 73 de df3lp,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> PS: chart from 1999-08-11 eclipse:
>>> http://www.qsl.net/df3lp/projects/eclipse/index.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>