Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v67D2caH030078 for ; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:02:39 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dTSon-0002gy-ES for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 13:57:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dTSol-0002gp-VB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 13:57:07 +0100 Received: from rgout0505.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.226] helo=rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dTSoi-0001Jy-Km for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 07 Jul 2017 13:57:06 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.186.115.165 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/50,refid=2.7.2:2017.7.7.121216:17:12.731,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __SUBJ_ALPHA_END, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY, __CTYPE_MULTIPART, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __MIME_TEXT_P2, __MIME_TEXT_H2, __ANY_URI, __HTTPS_URI, __URI_WITH_PATH, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL, __CP_URI_IN_BODY, __INT_PROD_GPS, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, SUPERLONG_LINE, __MULTIPLE_URI_TEXT, __URI_IN_BODY, __URI_NOT_IMG, __HTML_AHREF_TAG, __STYLE_RATWARE_NEG, __URI_WITHOUT_PATH, __STYLE_TAG, __HAS_HTML, __HTML_TAG_DIV, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_3000_MORE, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS, __MIME_TEXT_H1, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_HTML, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML, __URI_NS, HTML_50_70, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __MIME_TEXT_H, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, REFERENCES Received: from gnat (86.186.115.165) by rgout05.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 5957E506008B693A for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:57:02 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1499432224; bh=iVEnlZQ0M/F1qIlT6kjLlJb8HZXdQKXcfwZcsrGEckU=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=M1jozP+AaiiDjmXRNI015XpDztrmLxMIQHssg4Z9mL77EaRh+1mX4lC9hdlIOP/lazPO0+IB7dympJttwRi/GZrWXLUyQ2+pB/zlYsh5WbFcPRYGHFyww0FP/KoWrRd1CA1X+UQc9+FHyh+y9ElVlde9ZfBHLpVy1Zq8VcbWQbE= Message-ID: <8DEDAA0779A64803B9258F445F5F0BF8@gnat> From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <15d1c1535f5-4bc5-1c05d@webprd-a27.mail.aol.com> <595F7093.5070800@posteo.de> Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 13:21:21 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: 052e5a7ab87161a07560b72babff3441 Subject: Re: LF: Simple coherent frequency generator Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002E_01D2F723.EC791540" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12194 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01D2F723.EC791540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stefan yes I think you are right the attachment size in included in = the message size. I thought that was Riccardo's problem. If the = attachment is being stripped off, but the email passed, then I think = this might be occurring somewhere on route. At one time my ISP did not = allow attachments above 1.5MB to be sent to any destination, though I = could receive 20MB. This was a pain with papers, collaborative work, and = equipment manuals.=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: DK7FC=20 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org=20 Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:29 PM Subject: Re: LF: Simple coherent frequency generator Strange, normally when the attachment size becomes higher than about = 350 kB, the complete mail is rejected, not only the attachment. So maybe = the reason is somewhere else. 73, Stefan Am 07.07.2017 13:05, schrieb Alan Melia:=20 Hi Riccardo, I will forward attachments but there is a size = restriction (I can't no remember what it is but probably about 3 to = 500kB) This one is an old text distributors, from the days of dial-up = :-)) It will just dump oversize messages. Alan G3NYK =20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Riccardo Zoli=20 To: LF Group=20 Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 11:44 AM Subject: Re: LF: Simple coherent frequency generator Hi Markus, LF Sorry but I have got some problems with the reflector (no = forwarding with attachements). Link to schematics: = https://www.dropbox.com/sh/65l7vehoy96yon8/AABYdfyf5HkpdMVbDEI-TXbYa?dl=3D= 0=20 Yes, Markus. In David's PA the modulator (two XOR ports, SCH2) = it's inserted between D Flip Flop and MOS drive. The phase changes are = audible on output transformer during TX (like tic-tic-tic...), but it = works very well. We haven't tested NEO-6 modules, but i think NEO-M8N/Q is the = better choice (in particular for the TCXO on board and improved GPS RX = sensitivity). All the best ------=_NextPart_000_002E_01D2F723.EC791540 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =EF=BB=BF
Hi Stefan yes I think you are right the = attachment=20 size in included in the message size. I thought that was Riccardo's = problem. If=20 the attachment is being stripped off, but the email passed, then I = think=20 this might be occurring somewhere on route. At one time my ISP did not = allow=20 attachments above 1.5MB to be sent to any destination, though I = could=20 receive 20MB. This was a pain with papers, collaborative work, and = equipment=20 manuals.
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 DK7FC=20
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 = 12:29=20 PM
Subject: Re: LF: Simple = coherent=20 frequency generator

Strange, normally when the attachment size becomes = higher than=20 about 350 kB, the complete mail is rejected, not only the attachment. = So maybe=20 the reason is somewhere else.

73, Stefan

Am 07.07.2017 = 13:05,=20 schrieb Alan Melia:=20
Hi Riccardo, I will forward = attachments but=20 there is a size restriction (I can't no remember what it is but = probably=20 about 3 to 500kB) This one is an old text distributors,  from = the days=20 of dial-up :-))
It will just dump oversize=20 messages.
Alan
G3NYK  
-----=20 Original Message ----- From:=20 Riccardo Zoli To:=20 LF=20 Group Sent:=20 Friday, July 07, 2017 11:44 AM Subject:=20 Re: LF: Simple coherent frequency generator

Hi Markus, LF

Sorry but I have got some problems with the = reflector (no=20 forwarding with attachements).

Link to schematics:

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/65l7vehoy96yon8/AABYd= fyf5HkpdMVbDEI-TXbYa?dl=3D0=20

Yes, Markus. In David's PA the modulator (two XOR = ports,=20 SCH2) it's inserted between D Flip Flop and MOS drive. The phase = changes=20 are audible on output transformer during TX (like tic-tic-tic...), = but it=20 works very well.

We haven't tested NEO-6 modules, but i think = NEO-M8N/Q is=20 the better choice (in particular for the TCXO on board and = improved GPS RX=20 sensitivity).

All the best

------=_NextPart_000_002E_01D2F723.EC791540--