Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: dcc1: mailn 1182; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v6RDNRBg029644 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 15:23:29 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1daifz-0003U6-Fx for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:18:03 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1daify-0003Tx-Vg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:18:02 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1daifu-0005NM-Pg for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:18:01 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m85so93059232wma.1 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 06:17:58 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hj8A5GRj1SUZ0xqPTbZmYKVFI8iHz5OjOcqOIRhgYkQ=; b=MVdNruUXfS8uKDj0Sr6XCbU73N5cJNBV5594djUcUB+tT2pdIUqDO4SbPrMPcCtZTl TRPAY132onW4+mtXW0y4I0kV9HD0fxacK59tx+w/ygWl9g468cVEu66FbZT/GFovhMbX RCLxT7kdF9NfotbFTB0Mtzz95Rt9N0Ic0O/yhnpPQzGe/tGzGVJ3fgesbElJM9sNjGFr WPY/Fm1kjTsv7u8IDoRKzJEa0sanP9LSNVVcaRghWlw9i+lBsG++4OSFpINOpMnFSjmJ I2yhu4yX3w/jQpyCygkhqmKcwo3xmwUeeFKqZNgAZ4Bn3l7HonCtySNG3OibOzvqhsBc Mzng== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=hj8A5GRj1SUZ0xqPTbZmYKVFI8iHz5OjOcqOIRhgYkQ=; b=jGSW03OHa9+1NhiJFnoGTz+QrAm8QDfsy/hgy5IDkrY4hCE5OvptFup61bFXqADB5s iA9lGRO33kD84LA6G9oEMjE6u7p5+IuTBsqg5dEOG3iYt+0QLI/l1gXVNvC1eAW5hgGp K09FFRz9o49PaM5dEF4Ia+yqjlz/tFGcyAbswxsvAMhYiSoa/oAbDXnHaZ3dFb94aGLs k3vP1L65H4dkbhqm2jeugZdZAR6qR7y+5rgQFdBewnCz24Ejj5qRaHi2xFhiTGxJ7jph RxOittjdFwp6kaqLIicpiBivKgnwBP2Iq3c4fydhxZKT8aghzxCj+tHriEPBW4/0QEz2 5arg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw111orAiBzrVFFng6625xYIuV+xAgHwDZta+PUKce2clDwDta/+ZK w5FP8WM+roBdPxgL X-Received: by 10.28.2.84 with SMTP id 81mr3121650wmc.1.1501161477788; Thu, 27 Jul 2017 06:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a31sm45491520wrc.64.2017.07.27.06.17.56 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 06:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2017 14:17:55 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <441679828.20170727141755@gmail.com> To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <15d76cac1c1.marcocadeddu@tin.it> References: <15d76cac1c1.marcocadeddu@tin.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: c0336009bd9bab526ca27d297ea7579a Subject: Re: R: Re: LF: Re: Antenna change over relay question Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12299 Hello LF'ers, Thanks for all the great replies, I am near testing time with the none vac Russian REW15 relay, and I intend to use a second relay to ground the RX antenna jack of the TS-590 during TX. My hopefully final question is this. Should I just use a low current PCB mount type relay to ground the antenna co-ax in the switching box, or go for a big 100 Amp jobbie with the thought that SHOULD a kW of RF get to this relay for whatever reason it will probably blow a small relay apart, but a high current one SHOULD hold up and route it to ground and protect the RX side of the TS-590 (which is solely used for RX). Thanks, both for posts here and some remarkably detailed stuff by direct mail! Monday, July 24, 2017, 11:49:45 PM, you wrote: > Hello LF & VLF, > I posted my solution, but the attached picture of my ATU for LF/MF was > too much for blacksheep.. > In my ATU I have to switch in and out the LF base coil > of my antenna and change the matching transformer for LF and MF. > I made it with 2 vacuum relays: the switching of XFMR is made with a > Siemens VR311 (rated at 10kV 20A) the coil switching is made with a > Jennings RE6 which is rated at 25kV 25A. Both are of course surplus > purchases.. but are easy to find on e-bay. For new relays purchase, > don't forget, if still valid, that Kilovac was used to sell a small > number of relays each year to HAM operators with special (affordable.. > ) price: if you wish to have brand new units a check on their web pages > is worth ;-) > 73 Marco IK1HSS -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com