Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id v63LhJGY002462 for ; Mon, 3 Jul 2017 23:45:16 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dRIIw-0005sS-Dn for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:19:18 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dRIIv-0005sJ-Ab for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:19:17 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::230]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dRIIs-0003Il-3Q for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 14:19:15 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x230.google.com with SMTP id 77so215377714wrb.1 for ; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 06:19:13 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IiK4Ba4qlOE1uIYY9H4QLKasjN+BIZ334oHVoFKifs=; b=ocR7ohxbH/fnEkf/QGt6SZbUlYuSKr3FqezSgvOOUQkjGv0qlaKSpCe+WXbPqddbuY 0x4QxSeQXR21LD5f4KKdhkqqTwscYQr8EmyKKjIpimnpCTAhT5A3UGHB+Bbv17u/ll+0 /skq7ScODTbVvzGfVZ0uygEl5XIlMTUyuY1FfcuNfKBG8aecxjtGcolvcKYTLQWwaTRV QU9aopOXyKqfB8bVEmjFshBwoKJQa1eLsJx6jjEVVTiXBGebNqNcRzho7GNhvzDo9mTD RMJFBwWWT07GOEgfIlhYDVSIUMNmr3nbZgHg1c8dUNgKlyvJVCRscmJ2X93H9aDo3eIK Nolw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5IiK4Ba4qlOE1uIYY9H4QLKasjN+BIZ334oHVoFKifs=; b=GlRko0f1EMaCYbbVXsFWQMYTpxHPi6f2AtS0uSwJhATnAsabGB04pY5Pm1afR1tftp CDZ7E2bXTmGKVwXRCNsGAhcmOblE4amY74gzZVOYUJyxtM8C8QopbQxEOjlTa8irI/zu Cs5uOdPxxTK4ZHVilJNKuKWBpjH7kUjmHP70uMbHJIemkiBDo8aztsA9+zjkN7dL1BoV 0SqIwrHsKgAuW96UjWwgIG5vDplPdv6jWyfUHVDjGg+p7Fsd6oC4O6oTt1Hg0wYAiKJe fcpR1LKf3am8K1+74H23CKB8fECaBKKRVENKXYB2tDyCO1x4ewVWQgBq/QqSggcSJkSB pRlg== X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOyG5aPTvowJuJ/2ncXwvGlh+Brz0kdfS70XZ5Y8JtUfdmfX/I5i 5CFGxAtkMPZ2kGf2 X-Received: by 10.223.133.99 with SMTP id 90mr30153829wrh.44.1498915152542; Sat, 01 Jul 2017 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f45sm17998092wrf.2.2017.07.01.06.19.11 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 01 Jul 2017 06:19:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 14:19:11 +0100 From: Chris Wilson X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1024719802.20170701141911@gmail.com> To: Clemens Paul In-Reply-To: References: <94719482.20170623130346@gmail.com> <408186507.20170624173207@gmail.com> <1B7B7537AD024FBDAA5E898E3DF21AAB@Clemens0811> <1483178977.20170624190258@gmail.com> <741897120.20170624204412@gmail.com> <2A1ED0432B3E4914AF1896E8F1B83924@Clemens0811> <498643488.20170626115655@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 086f3faad0220c9ae57a7913e711a86d Subject: Re: LF: RE: Transformer questions. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12163 Hello Clemens, OK, I get it now, thanks for the clarifications Clemens! Tuesday, June 27, 2017, 7:38:13 PM, you wrote: > Hi Chris, >>I seem to be being >>told the impedance matching transformer in the white box could be >>upstairs in the shack by one, and it has to be by the loading coil by >>your good self! > In my first reply from 24.6.2017 > "This would be possible but more or less lossy" > it was not clear to me that you would possibly like to tap the transformer > *of the combiner* and that the LPF is ahead of it. > So,as I said in my last reply it is the best to let things as they are. > 73 > Clemens > DL4RAJ -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead.fets@gmail.com