Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v57JGTlx009035 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 21:16:30 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dIgNQ-0002nM-OP for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:12:20 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dIgNQ-0002nD-9i for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:12:20 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com>) id 1dIgNN-0005gk-H3 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 20:12:19 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id d73so17475063wma.0 for ; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:12:16 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WKKkwtSAZWYi1OXsbYpsszu7GerrxR4f9FMiPt5LlJM=; b=GM9sneDk+JRxaRSdg8KhoYz9eUWfIcJXLY74os7cjXefznVNFG7oUJo1n9QvyTd8hn u3KIG/lmb1hT2klK9ChmilQEZJFnAEgCWeqmHPaI526tYzuK5br/EsWcwr1ZaHEOGF1/ DpUapoYG/C7mrO5+RpGOIwTKKvrLjgfuxIyTs3aU0xMWMsR83oNV1lksXI+SUNUxqM8G SXxDnpQepJ9C8KFOHatVAsg+lBivQyD4VI2GN0Yf9lxkzAqmGZZNj8tN0/GERwpR/A1Q vifVG+QJzXJL2O/slzCCMGLRoOETmy3SRVMjUut60r1TbQ5I8cM0snPNd0HUX9nj3rh3 fraA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=WKKkwtSAZWYi1OXsbYpsszu7GerrxR4f9FMiPt5LlJM=; b=slj4QUCBhO6plm2Uh8VAWq4lw1h/zaBihv4rTY6k+EGT2ZW5wzKuFtIB3MeRPJdfCV X7XFYS2OB7iqP6iCMoLNU5xb1FztY+d5wTgbK75j49NTQg55WpJUGHS6pbvkma0Eu4BN ic32TauQDPYA4GdHZzWQcKjI27E3Q36xq3x6iWtqOFuk/QfWFdZXFCBhqa9sHzJiEppT DNT1Dc9hk9zAJiGncr6KQ5Xe37LSwc703PVPBM8eqs0d3aEByg5E2gNFrG5aW/Ooh8YN xoclboObchq0hR6WCHpPAlhHztFpeNUxdZjEBvfGPLWw7JNM10AYIMxLKACdOvP6i4tJ KTOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcCtiucH/krUxcF0DezUYsCDNjCquqbNKulEx3trch8hhiZKIVvp V3i6My/2y9hGx0kDRpW2k4K4JZjKtw== X-Received: by 10.28.232.8 with SMTP id f8mr799360wmh.51.1496862736053; Wed, 07 Jun 2017 12:12:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.166.116 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:12:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <953388818.20170606163952@gmail.com> References: <953388818.20170606163952@gmail.com> From: Lawrence Galea <9h9mhrlaw@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 21:12:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: 4e3b1488273adbbe9757d6bdd5adf219 Subject: Re: LF: Decoupling linear PSU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11920 Hi Chris, Did you Try capacitors across the supply lines right at the output connectors and also from both + and - to earth? Did you try the same at the mains input with suitable voltage rating? Regards Lawrence On 6/6/17, Chris Wilson wrote: > Hello LF'ers, > > I have had a few issues with my lovely old Farnell H60/50 linear > bench power supply. It'll do 60V @ 50A but I suspect it's last couple > of uncontrolled output voltage failures may have been caused by RF > getting into it, maybe up the output leads, maybe elsewhere. The > manual makes mention of using caps of "a suitable value" across the > output, or each output pin to ground, when used to power "transient > loads" ; it's far from clear what's meant. The -ve floats relative to > chassis ground. What do people recommend as a means of stopping RF > getting in via the + and - output leads please? > > It has SCR control on the transformers primary to keep the voltage > drop across the huge pass transistor tunnel down to around 8V, this > seems to go haywire at random times when powering my TX, and the > 2N3055's don't like 103V into them. Worst case scenario should be > 73V, but I am pretty sure SCR control fails and the secondary rises > to its full potential. Thanks. > > -- > Best regards, > Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com > > >