Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v53GXFuc018214 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:33:16 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dHBv1-0007mZ-T4 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:28:51 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dHBv1-0007mQ-Du for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:28:51 +0100 Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dHBuy-00054p-FY for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:28:50 +0100 Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id c184so50597509lfe.2 for ; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:28:48 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ujOgzPfUQ5ymVNYBQBTJS4noJ7vrV8YaIlEwtFF/jGQ=; b=RTge1WI1V+/lPtORmNPvEF6pIAQ/M8lnPLcetCf1QBGZXPtaY2yIo5/zztF7q3IjRo FBPkI+dvni1tsCPZCaoxucLo9ExcLqzI02ymhxfO0LH8qeLMjiCrRkNWW7dUENUOGv/l ZXV6N4mtPvvbCskJ6ksINuhUh1HqV61OTvFaTzlhTxloUjd/b0QFJJA5adRkcAjBASoS sER03t+r9wahYP/+26bX3YpS2wzHcW3mD02tKzF5xesjVwlzJD+odjmLm9om3No/fNQa BcgRU3eUHDLo6Xx+GJM5T4jgSy8g7QUS9Hbv5LiuNMmCG56mqm3/Z/zLtcLPJLeH9R0M 4qPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ujOgzPfUQ5ymVNYBQBTJS4noJ7vrV8YaIlEwtFF/jGQ=; b=EnPQejxBYMM/Z3vCyNxeTtyLbtYCHBYkdTNfMO9ZJcK7QPehXK32x0Myhc3v9mGV24 k4wQjJLujosZo0Xwv/+BqGtkj0mAMXsIr6CKfP0ojLcFBljnp6dkzheWSSGC8ynDBAEq dx103V0DSrbvk8RLvKMf+9WKpNO7trscUTCLeCi0f2Haaa2njFhhhQZG+1sO6lDpABe3 B3WvrKSILUp2H9X1RXwHhPxRDxYgDPudfzFpTsK85rKevs7vKw7GuygPl7GHE0bN8W4e /VoiZEsdkadmy8fsq/MaXd0MJGo1HomKfUxMR8xBqBzzOguCNp2PErLEU5Erx8RBP8Kr 90rA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDPPFidx8A541aJXVqhf0a/PNmUKrpspTNIPTaJEuCrU5sWiS9Y oHX75N/8c4Lm4Zdz00lo+0g36xSqbg== X-Received: by 10.25.217.66 with SMTP id q63mr4220808lfg.89.1496507326320; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 09:28:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.25.156.13 with HTTP; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 09:28:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <15c6ebbc89e-6102-abe63@webprd-a56.mail.aol.com> References: <15c6e6a8ba3.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <15c6ebbc89e-6102-abe63@webprd-a56.mail.aol.com> From: Andy Talbot Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 17:28:45 +0100 Message-ID: To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Scan-Signature: c8ff00257edaad8e124ab9389da9609a Subject: Re: LF: For today the FETs survived... - not enough gate voltage? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c184b1496d52f055110c30f" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11869 --94eb2c184b1496d52f055110c30f Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Interesting thought. Checked my own design (the QEX article is the only remaining documentation!) and checked I also have a 1:1+1 driver transformer. But I do use a 15V rail for the driver, so +/- 7.5V which is a bit more than Marco's But never considered that ... Andy G4JNT On 3 June 2017 at 17:13, Markus Vester wrote: > Hi Marco, > > looking at your schematic, I think the gate drive may be too low. Ideally > the driver will make 12 V peak-peak, or +-6V at the gate (probably slight= ly > less in reality, e.g. 5 V). This may not be enough to turn the FETs fully > on. So when increasing the drain suppy voltage beyond a certain limit, th= ey > will go out of saturation and limit the available output current. In that > case you won't get more output power but only much more dissipation. Also > the output impedance will go from low (voltage-source) to high > (current-source), which could explain the changing frequency response. > > I would recommend to double the turns ratio of the gate transformer (e.g. > 10:20:20). > > 73, Markus (DF6NM) > > -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: marcocadeddu > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: Sa, 3. Jun 2017 16:46 > Betreff: R: Re: R: Re: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... > > Hi Stefan, > > and thank you :-) so you have too something to mumble while sending > VLF SMS ;-) > There is nothing really new.. I started from an avalable > chassis with on board a PS giving 180Vdc (1200W) and assembled the > Andy's half bridge 700W switching PA and before give it the full power > I'm checking with lower DC supply. Attached you see the schematic with > some change at the moment.. > The output xfmr has 7T/19T, the coil of the guard circuit is not > connected (now is in serie with L2) and the resonating caps now are > 5x1000pF in parallel. > The aim is finally with 180Vdc of supply have an output of 0,5=C3=B71kW > but.... as you probably red in the previous messages, from 10 to 30Vdc > the PA runs, at low power of course (up to 15W), and complies the > calculations; with supply between 30 and 50 Vdc the output go down to a > couple of W. > I made several trials it the last days, changing the core of the xfmr, > the turn ratio, the kind of capacitators but nothing changes (or at > least the change are within a fraction of dB). > > that's the sad history Stefan... > All thoughts and suggestions are welcome! (including go to fish ;-)) ) > Marco > > ... > > --94eb2c184b1496d52f055110c30f Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Interesting thought.

Checked my own design (t= he QEX article is the only remaining documentation!) and checked I =C2=A0al= so have a 1:1+1 driver transformer.
But I do use a 15V rail for t= he driver, so +/- 7.5V which is a bit more than Marco's

<= /div>
But never considered that ...

Andy =C2= =A0G4JNT


On 3 June 2017 at 17:13, Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.co= m> wrote:
Hi M= arco,

looking at your schematic, I think the gate drive may be too l= ow. Ideally the driver will make 12 V peak-peak, or +-6V at the gate (proba= bly slightly less in reality, e.g. 5 V). This may not be enough to turn the= FETs fully on. So when increasing the drain suppy voltage beyond a certain= limit, they will go out of saturation and limit the available output curre= nt. In that case you won't get=C2=A0more output power but only=C2=A0muc= h more=C2=A0dissipation. Also the output impedance will go from low (voltag= e-source)=C2=A0to high (current-source), which could=C2=A0explain the chang= ing frequency response.

I would recommend to=C2=A0double the turns = ratio of the gate transformer (e.g. 10:20:20).

73, Markus (DF6NM)
-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: marcocadeddu <marcocadeddu@tin.it>
An: rsgb_lf_group <
rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: S= a, 3. Jun 2017 16:46
Betreff: R: Re: R: Re: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the= FETs survived...

Hi Stefan,

and thank you :-) so you h= ave too something to mumble while sending
VLF SMS ;-)
There is nothi= ng really new.. I started from an avalable
chassis with on board a PS g= iving 180Vdc (1200W) and assembled the
Andy's half bridge 700W swit= ching PA and before give it the full power
I'm checking with lower = DC supply. Attached you see the schematic with
some change at the momen= t..
The output xfmr has 7T/19T, the coil of the guard circuit is not connected (now is in serie with L2) and the resonating caps now are
5x= 1000pF in parallel.
The aim is finally with 180Vdc of supply have an out= put of 0,5=C3=B71kW
but.... as you probably red in the previous message= s, from 10 to 30Vdc
the PA runs, at low power of course (up to 15W), an= d complies the
calculations; with supply between 30 and 50 Vdc the outp= ut go down to a
couple of W.
I made several trials it the last days,= changing the core of the xfmr,
the turn ratio, the kind of capacitator= s but nothing changes (or at
least the change are within a fraction of = dB).

that's the sad history Stefan...
All thoughts and sugges= tions are welcome! (including go to fish ;-)) )
Marco

...

=

--94eb2c184b1496d52f055110c30f--