Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: x.dcc-servers: mailn 104; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v5ILmRJS032592 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:48:28 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dMhzf-00011S-UV for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:44:27 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dMhzf-00011J-3N for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:44:27 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dMhzc-0005Hz-7m for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 22:44:25 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED4320AB4 for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:44:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3wrSLF5SSyzytZ for ; Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:44:21 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <5946F435.2090809@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2017 23:44:21 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15cbcd11867-7c8a-1b647@webprd-a40.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <15cbcd11867-7c8a-1b647@webprd-a40.mail.aol.com> X-Scan-Signature: 7c995d39cde70605aa76dd18810a4256 Subject: Re: LF: EbNaut test Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080907010207080800020807" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 12026 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080907010207080800020807 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks Markus, nice. We could exchange 1000 characters in 2 minutes, if the Eb/N0 calculation is correct :-) Maybe i will try another one with Domenico when he is back. And is RN3AUS reading this email? Is someone else interested in an LF EnNaut test, if the equipment is available,maybe W1TAG? 73, Stefan Am 18.06.2017 22:07, schrieb Markus Vester: > Hi Stefan, > > a fine and error-free decode, best with 0.3 s extra delay. A phase > glitch occured here near the middle, presumably on the receive side. > > Best 73, > Markus > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > An: rsgb_lf_group > Verschickt: So, 18. Jun 2017 18:35 > Betreff: Re: LF: EbNaut test > > PS: This time 100 Hz higher > > Am 18.06.2017 18:28, schrieb DK7FC: > > Hello Markus, > > Oh, you are right. Same message on 16:30 utc. .. > I hope it works... > > 73, Stefan > > Am 18.06.2017 16:56, schrieb Markus Vester: > > Hi Stefan, > > I'd like to try. But the QRG 137.43 kHz was below my opds > capture range (137.45 to 137.55 kHz). > > 73, Markus > > > > > -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- > Von: DK7FC > > An: rsgb_lf_group > > Verschickt: So, 18. Jun 2017 16:47 > Betreff: LF: EbNaut test > > Hi LFers, > > My first EbNaut message is running at the moment. Not sure if > the timing > and keying is OK. Could someone check if it can be decoded? > Don't make a > secret out of the message. > > Parameters: 4K19A, 1sec, 10 char, CRC16, Start:14:36 UTC > (maybe there is > a timing offset between +-1 sec? pse report). > > 73, Stefan > --------------080907010207080800020807 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Thanks Markus, nice. We could exchange 1000 characters in 2 minutes, if the Eb/N0 calculation is correct :-)
Maybe i will try another one with Domenico when he is back. And is RN3AUS reading this email?
Is someone else interested in an LF EnNaut test, if the equipment is available,maybe W1TAG?

73, Stefan

Am 18.06.2017 22:07, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Stefan,

a fine and error-free decode, best with 0.3 s extra delay. A phase glitch occured here near the middle, presumably on the receive side.

Best 73,
Markus



-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 18. Jun 2017 18:35
Betreff: Re: LF: EbNaut test

PS: This time 100 Hz higher

Am 18.06.2017 18:28, schrieb DK7FC:
Hello Markus,

Oh, you are right. Same message on 16:30 utc. ..
I hope it works...

73, Stefan

Am 18.06.2017 16:56, schrieb Markus Vester:
Hi Stefan,

I'd like to try. But the QRG 137.43 kHz was below my opds capture range (137.45 to 137.55 kHz).

73, Markus




-----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: So, 18. Jun 2017 16:47
Betreff: LF: EbNaut test

Hi LFers,

My first EbNaut message is running at the moment. Not sure if the timing
and keying is OK. Could someone check if it can be decoded? Don't make a
secret out of the message.

Parameters: 4K19A, 1sec, 10 char, CRC16, Start:14:36 UTC (maybe there is
a timing offset between +-1 sec? pse report).

73, Stefan

--------------080907010207080800020807--