Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v53GICSF018160 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 18:18:13 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dHBgT-0007dv-GS for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:13:49 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dHBgT-0007dm-26 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:13:49 +0100 Received: from omr-m008e.mx.aol.com ([204.29.186.7]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dHBgP-00050o-UK for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 17:13:47 +0100 Received: from mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com [172.26.254.175]) by omr-m008e.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id 7CE0B3800111 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:13:40 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-acb10h.mail.aol.com (core-acb10.mail.aol.com [172.27.24.10]) by mtaomg-mbe01.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id E4EDA38000081 for ; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:13:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 188.192.95.60 by webprd-a56.mail.aol.com (10.72.52.216) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sat, 03 Jun 2017 12:13:39 -0400 Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:13:39 -0400 From: Markus Vester To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Message-Id: <15c6ebbc89e-6102-abe63@webprd-a56.mail.aol.com> In-Reply-To: <15c6e6a8ba3.marcocadeddu@tin.it> References: <15c6e6a8ba3.marcocadeddu@tin.it> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User X-Mailer: JAS STD X-Originating-IP: [188.192.95.60] x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20150623; t=1496506420; bh=LclyOE0YYF44cEm09ibpSN6J95uzv4/sT5YxLEsgaNg=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=HneOipwW7jCcQTeYHF0Ae/sONkUL7VK88Vyo+s+GxyPrPL+ZwZYMlfzt9BeAgvTFJ NeT1kVCuN+wHp2pk+jOl/GcwrZh5j1A9pW6xZAy/Mwe61OC3mHXEUTo1gz4vC2pmaD ZCGYWFxieRXdz4dSR6VZ1bhz5YaaQC1sgamHLU5g= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1afeaf5932e0332dba X-Scan-Signature: 39d0aa3a8a50eef73e9de70bcfcadb32 Subject: Re: LF: For today the FETs survived... - not enough gate voltage? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_750995_971194941.1496506419356" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11868 ------=_Part_750995_971194941.1496506419356 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Marco, looking at your schematic, I think the gate drive may be too low. Ideally t= he driver will make 12 V peak-peak, or +-6V at the gate (probably slightly = less in reality, e.g. 5 V). This may not be enough to turn the FETs fully o= n. So when increasing the drain suppy voltage beyond a certain limit, they = will go out of saturation and limit the available output current. In that c= ase you won't get more output power but only much more dissipation. Also th= e output impedance will go from low (voltage-source) to high (current-sourc= e), which could explain the changing frequency response.=20 I would recommend to double the turns ratio of the gate transformer (e.g. 1= 0:20:20). 73, Markus (DF6NM) -----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20 Von: marcocadeddu An: rsgb_lf_group Verschickt: Sa, 3. Jun 2017 16:46 Betreff: R: Re: R: Re: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived... Hi Stefan, and thank you :-) so you have too something to mumble while sending=20 VLF SMS ;-) There is nothing really new.. I started from an avalable=20 chassis with on board a PS giving 180Vdc (1200W) and assembled the=20 Andy's half bridge 700W switching PA and before give it the full power=20 I'm checking with lower DC supply. Attached you see the schematic with=20 some change at the moment.. The output xfmr has 7T/19T, the coil of the guard circuit is not=20 connected (now is in serie with L2) and the resonating caps now are=20 5x1000pF in parallel. The aim is finally with 180Vdc of supply have an output of 0,5=C3=B71kW=20 but.... as you probably red in the previous messages, from 10 to 30Vdc=20 the PA runs, at low power of course (up to 15W), and complies the=20 calculations; with supply between 30 and 50 Vdc the output go down to a=20 couple of W. I made several trials it the last days, changing the core of the xfmr,=20 the turn ratio, the kind of capacitators but nothing changes (or at=20 least the change are within a fraction of dB). that's the sad history Stefan... All thoughts and suggestions are welcome! (including go to fish ;-)) ) Marco ... ------=_Part_750995_971194941.1496506419356 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Marco,

looking at your schematic, I think the = gate drive may be too low. Ideally the driver will make 12 V peak-peak, or = +-6V at the gate (probably slightly less in reality, e.g. 5 V). This may no= t be enough to turn the FETs fully on. So when increasing the drain suppy v= oltage beyond a certain limit, they will go out of saturation and limit the= available output current. In that case you won't get more output powe= r but only much more dissipation. Also the output impedance will = go from low (voltage-source) to high (current-source), which could&nbs= p;explain the changing frequency response.

I would recommend to&nbs= p;double the turns ratio of the gate transformer (e.g. 10:20:20).

73= , Markus (DF6NM)

-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----
Von: ma= rcocadeddu <marcocadeddu@tin.it>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_gro= up@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Sa, 3. Jun 2017 16:46
Betreff: R: R= e: R: Re: LF: Re: I: Fw: For today the FETs survived...

Hi Ste= fan,

and thank you :-) so you have too something to mumble while sen= ding
VLF SMS ;-)
There is nothing really new.. I started from an ava= lable
chassis with on board a PS giving 180Vdc (1200W) and assembled th= e
Andy's half bridge 700W switching PA and before give it the full powe= r
I'm checking with lower DC supply. Attached you see the schematic wit= h
some change at the moment..
The output xfmr has 7T/19T, the coil o= f the guard circuit is not
connected (now is in serie with L2) and the = resonating caps now are
5x1000pF in parallel.
The aim is finally wit= h 180Vdc of supply have an output of 0,5=C3=B71kW
but.... as you probab= ly red in the previous messages, from 10 to 30Vdc
the PA runs, at low p= ower of course (up to 15W), and complies the
calculations; with supply = between 30 and 50 Vdc the output go down to a
couple of W.
I made se= veral trials it the last days, changing the core of the xfmr,
the turn = ratio, the kind of capacitators but nothing changes (or at
least the ch= ange are within a fraction of dB).

that's the sad history Stefan...<= br>All thoughts and suggestions are welcome! (including go to fish ;-)) )Marco

...

------=_Part_750995_971194941.1496506419356--