Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: wuwien: mailn 1290; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v4OGnR98005328 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 18:49:28 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1dDZNN-0004s5-Bq for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 17:43:09 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1dDZNM-0004rw-Ik for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 17:43:08 +0100 Received: from lethe.lipkowski.org ([178.32.151.135] helo=lipkowski.org) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1dDZNJ-0002Yq-Gl for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 24 May 2017 17:43:07 +0100 Received: from mailn.lipkowski.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v4OGhQ0c005265 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 18:43:26 +0200 Received: from localhost (sq5bpf@localhost) by mailn.lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id v4OGhPSJ005261 for ; Wed, 24 May 2017 18:43:25 +0200 X-Authentication-Warning: mailn.lipkowski.org: sq5bpf owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 18:43:25 +0200 (CEST) From: Jacek Lipkowski To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org In-Reply-To: <592342DF.2060405@posteo.de> Message-ID: References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD9B58@servigilant.vigilant.local> <06321950-5207-1067-23cc-2237f859ad4f@abelian.org> <7f8dcfe3-83e6-ae0c-c004-cb78f5f33c7c@abelian.org> <675856377.119399.1494880952530@connect.xfinity.com> <10bf8134-0330-03c1-c7be-02b6a0391aa3@abelian.org> <1fb38e09-2adf-bdb8-1e28-5064ef604d2c@abelian.org> <17af4668-083c-ea04-9622-dbb1de768f2b@abelian.org> <59233AC1.7040707@posteo.de> <592342DF.2060405@posteo.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 on 10.1.3.10 X-Scan-Signature: c9d6a1e47761f7ec7375ac340bef30d0 Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut tonite Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="17435139-487723098-1495644205=:685" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11752 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --17435139-487723098-1495644205=:685 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Decoded the 20170522 message on 8270.1Hz found rank 0 ber 3.4079e-01 Eb/N0 2.8 M -3.252938271e+00 [xxxxx xxxxxx] ps [ 0 0 0 0 0] carrier phase: 5.7 deg carrier Eb/N0: 2.2 dB carrier Es/N0: -11.31 dB carrier S/N: 20.51 dB in 32.9 uHz, -24.32 dB in 1Hz, -58.30 dB in 2.5kHz elapsed 51 VY 73 Jacek / SQ5BPF On Mon, 22 May 2017, DK7FC wrote: > Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 21:58:23 +0200 > From: DK7FC > Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: VLF: EbNaut tonite > > VLF, > > After some time, there will be another EbNaut transmission tonite: > > f = 8270.100000 Hz > Start time: 22.May.2017   20:00:00 UTC > Symbol period: 20 s > Characters: 12 > CRC bits: 3 > Coding 16K21A > Duration: 8h, 26m, 40s > Antenna current: 700 mA > > I hope this does not affect the reception of VO1NA at Paul's RX site. Does it? We quickly need a band > plan ;-) > > This message can only be decodes by the best RX stations here in a 'short' range, Paul, Jacek and Markus > are the ones i assume. > > After a week on 970 Hz it's time to come back to the higher frequencies again, those that even use a 'k' > in front of 'Hz' :-) > > > 73, Stefan > > --17435139-487723098-1495644205=:685--