Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v4DDMha4018748 for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:22:45 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1d9WwC-0002uS-Dd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 14:18:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1d9Ww6-0002uJ-7V for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 14:18:18 +0100 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d9Ww3-0006YS-7G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sat, 13 May 2017 14:18:16 +0100 Received: from Clemens0811 ([79.208.130.28]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M1zFf-1e1ufZ2D6p-00u2tI for ; Sat, 13 May 2017 15:18:14 +0200 From: "Clemens Paul" To: References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDDBABF@servigilant.vigilant.local> <5915A837.2030707@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: <5915A837.2030707@posteo.de> Date: Sat, 13 May 2017 15:17:21 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: AdLLGi1+N757m3D8Qf6Y62hWW9ciogA0CI1g X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:M8gyNYdc7ALRQILXl09CUYCNHwl9v9lo49nMsFky7+OFud82COI B4iMvdl9XVEevdCcayHeCvJNnwTibjEOOW+uHpIFXNHB7RsJSx/vD8ftTZI2Ns3fsgI9uz6 i8vJh/wjb3Q6t+2LKpi53IqQziAJQw0k0r78uqdadmS3bfrAHH9/MPsJ3kTC6eXFON5AZRE FHIWXxFfAvbz53F/+HXeA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:i444i20u6oU=:3xp9G537iTa1v8AptYLJfL 2fACt239A/nWeTE6db8HPNpgPl3EhY4uTu5cMrm3sPIb9oJm4bcZrAUt8GDiIXEfQMBD929QV B7HjZievnLr7WB4peFAvR6M9uCtHYr+ZkgSqMxwbsr67IkvKxAiX9WyZnQUMVnjqhHCejGFwF sSzRqhqEVowij4XXDKCzmuGd31BBvt8MM+B9XB1WPH4sDuwtSWkfU7aMoUmNB8pQHa9Q9yL9Q rwPve2yuN0iG8e1kZvvfBMFzLWSyadgpVTS19adgLfHz4J6pCNcgCWvJx3l3pQ7twitdx/K+X 2pvHXY7MOQIvJxSoNxb567asrOOS8alO2AgxuVyowxJj/9HaT8x1U2s50cDnmWhAIIVKydU4V bY6Xe+phbJF+cFLFwGkiEUbxmZsD1FB96FmQ71Q5/cdlqYp7oYpAgH9x5+6cLjlClTMNk3KeW Biy/uyVfvuYqqwcjh5IfjTd7KKgX7ApOlyRHVlVAxbjtPCdP4mpzdF1Ah9Z6fylB3Q1rTwVJC DlK5C04FnAVCwq8mZDII0/pRmicsRzN4tF9+Kl/moV2dT2VnjR44S/lOAmUincRaZsVbmPmZv GOnnYgZot/yibx/mcYWOzSaL7M46Ks3zpm7yvMGo3TyLNhVJ9ZubSNhFvDCcE3HbAAyw81jGj uMnHCLOJZLpnqICmwr2LwHf5BTURiJw/IAmKbOuOrdnxcJejr1QptCa7vI4PKJGV1DKySCoPb 5gmJIIieVk98Kth4A4vSkKLBMH3zL9JKYyYOWu6qeoYjW8spqsoj8wKZLVQFKAUrTrQt0Tj3h oRsmcXc X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: RE: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lipkowski.org id v4DDMha4018748 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11686 Hi Luis & Stefan, >>...ill try also a twisted pair instead of the coax >>...Then you can clearly hear the hum of the QRM noises >...There will be no improvement. I would stay at coax. Hum means H-fields. Coax shield is completely transparent i.e. without any effect to H-fields. The question is where the hum is being picked up. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >[mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC >Sent: Friday, May 12, 2017 2:19 PM >To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org >Subject: Re: LF: Some improvements in VLF Rx > >Hi Luis, > >Am 12.05.2017 11:43, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > > > I can add an SMD ferrite bead (0805) in the gate > >Worth to try. > > > > > The voltage in the coax down in the shack after the >390R is 6V. Power supply is 14V. So there must be some current >trought the FET > Will measure the current > >Yes it is 8V/390R = 20 mA. That's a bit much. You could >increase that resistor to get about 10 mA, maybe 680 Ohm is a >good value. > > > > > This is the picture of the 5m mast, which is metal. The >last section is a PVC pipe which holds the MiniWhip. The VLF >probe is hold in a plastic box > containing the FET and attached to the metal mast using >a metal adaptor. So it is quite close to the metal mast, which >can provide high capacity ? > Probe lenght is 1m > >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7162072/fotos%20varias/MF/I >MG_20170430_125017.jpg > >Looks like a good place. The 1m probe should be fine. The >capacity is given by the probe, about 5 pF/m is the rule. 1m >should be fine when the antenna is at this location. >The only problem seems to be the contaminated ground. You just >need to experiment and find the best results. >Maybe it helps to isolate the probe ground from the mast and >feed the cable down to the ground where it has its own earth >and an isolation transformer between the TV cable and >soundcard... You know... > > > > Yes. Using the battery there was no difference, once >the ground loop was removed. > >Sounds good! > > > > That will be fine ! File is here > >https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/7162072/fotos%20varias/MF/V LF_Soundcard_32KHz.USR > >Modified file in attachment. > > > Will try also a twisted pair instead of the coax > >There will be no improvement. I would stay at coax.> >Good luck for getting a cleaner background... > >73, Stefan >