Message-ID: <5922C61E.1020706@posteo.de>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 13:06:06 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <15c1258d892.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <849163045.20170522103353@gmail.com> <5922B32B.3050107@posteo.de> <1793613685.20170522105521@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <1793613685.20170522105521@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: R: Re: R: Re: LF: RE: Combining LF amps revisited
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

Hi Chris,

Thank you.
There have been EbNaut transmissions on LF too. You could start to 
transmit there, just for fun. A few RX stations are available on LF. My 
EbNaut monitor is running all the time, i.e. i'm generating txt files 
which contain the data for a decode. You can give it a try with messages 
taking up to about 30 minutes which is quite a lot on LF. The preferred 
range is 137.450...137.550 kHz. With your strong LF signal i assume it 
would be no problem to transfer your callsign and locator in a range of 
 > 3000 km.
You need a very stable signal of course.

73, Stefan


Am 22.05.2017 11:55, schrieb Chris Wilson:
> Hello DK7FC,
>
> Monday, May 22, 2017, 10:45:15 AM, you wrote:
>
>
>
>    
>> Am 22.05.2017 11:33, schrieb Chris Wilson:
>>      
>>> Interest seems to have shifted slightly to the wonderful Ebnaut on
>>> VLF  at  the  moment, something i one day wish to try
>>>
>>>        
>    
>> Hi Chris :-)
>> Do you wish to try it TX or RX wise? Did you already start some attempts?
>>      
>    
>> 73, Stefan
>>      
>
> I  did the decoding tests successfully, whilst I would like to try it I
> am up to my eyes with work at the moment, and I also have to ascertain
> if the local noise I now suffer on 136khz is gone on VLF. I have never
> even  attempted  to receive anything below 136kHz to be honest. When I
> have  more  time  I  will  be "down there" giving it a go. Right now I
> should  concentrate  on getting my LF antenna much highr and away from
> the  house further... I follow your VLF adventures with great interest
> though, it's amazing what you are all achieving!
>
>