Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v41CX9UK002656 for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 14:33:10 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1d5AS1-0002rs-A3 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 13:29:13 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1d5AS0-0002rj-SN for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 13:29:12 +0100 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d5ARx-00053b-Vt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 13:29:11 +0100 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 413B120A7B for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 14:29:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3wGkHm5LRWz107j for ; Mon, 1 May 2017 14:29:08 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <59072A14.9000605@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 01 May 2017 14:29:08 +0200 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD5814@servigilant.vigilant.local>,<15bbecd3310-f86-eb79@webprd-a75.mail.aol.com> <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD5A80@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD5A80@servigilant.vigilant.local> X-Scan-Signature: c95b9a52470b89d54f2ef38e923e05cb Subject: Re: LF: SL settings for EbNaut FFT recording ? Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020003050008090005070305" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11541 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020003050008090005070305 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Luis, What is the link to the grabber (again) please? Something with ure.es i think... I would prefer to run the soundcard at 48 kS/s anyway because you will be able to run much more SL instances in parallel then. The number of parallel running instances can increase quickly :-) 8.9 hours for a FFT may be a bit to short though. It is not really a short distance so we may need all the time we can get to pass a first short message through. For a spectrogram it makes sense to try 47 uHz i would say. Can you generate your own test signal on the MF antenna in 7 km distance? It should be possible to see a few 100V put on the TX antenna, so it is worth to experiment a bit. Maybe a microwave transformer from ebay or so. SpecLab can generate the tone/frequency. Use an available audio PA to drive the transformer, carefully. Could become your first DX on VLF! :-) 73, Stefan Am 30.04.2017 20:49, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: > Thank you very much Markus > > The .USR file is useful, but your detailed explanations are even > better to understand what's going on > Would worth to add it to your EbNaut utilities > > So far so good. SL is "armed" and working on the next FFT in a few hours > Yes. Patience is a must when you play with high integration FFTs. This > is not a game for nervous players ;-) > > I was using 192Khz sample rate but have changed to 48KHz to fit with > your decimation and FFT lenght > The 1pps syncronization is working good and the SR is adjusted > properly. I get the NMEA via com port > and system is reported by SL to be just few mili seconds from GPS > > All ready here to receive a transmission ! > > 73 de Luis > EA5DOM --------------020003050008090005070305 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi Luis,

What is the link to the grabber (again) please? Something with ure.es i think...

I would prefer to run the soundcard at 48 kS/s anyway because you will be able to run much more SL instances in parallel then. The number of parallel running instances can increase quickly :-)

8.9 hours for a FFT may be a bit to short though. It is not really a short distance so we may need all the time we can get to pass a first short message through. For a spectrogram it makes sense to try 47 uHz i would say.

Can you generate your own test signal on the MF antenna in 7 km distance? It should be possible to see a few 100V put on the TX antenna, so it is worth to experiment a bit. Maybe a microwave transformer from ebay or so. SpecLab can generate the tone/frequency. Use an available audio PA to drive the transformer, carefully. Could become your first DX on VLF! :-)

73, Stefan


Am 30.04.2017 20:49, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández:
Thank you very much Markus

The .USR file is useful, but your detailed explanations are even better to understand what's going on
Would worth to add it to your EbNaut utilities

So far so good. SL is "armed" and working on the next FFT in a few hours
Yes. Patience is a must when you play with high integration FFTs. This is not a game for nervous players ;-)

I was using 192Khz sample rate but have changed to 48KHz to fit with your decimation and FFT lenght
The 1pps syncronization is working good and the SR is adjusted properly. I get the NMEA via com port
and system is reported by SL to be just few mili seconds from GPS 

All ready here to receive a transmission !

73 de Luis
EA5DOM 
--------------020003050008090005070305--