Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.9 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB,SPF_PASS,SUBJ_ALL_CAPS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v498jCej032355 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 10:45:13 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1d80eN-00054z-Nb for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 09:37:43 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1d80eL-00054q-4v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 09:37:41 +0100 Received: from gmy2-mh863.smtproutes.com ([94.186.192.192]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d80eH-00047M-5u for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 09:37:39 +0100 X-Katharion-ID: 1494319040.47112.gmy2-mh863 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.es ([85.60.35.36]) by gmy2-mh863.smtproutes.com [(94.186.192.192)] with ESMTP via TCP (TLSv1/TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA); 09 May 2017 08:37:20 +0000 Received: from servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448]) by servigilant.vigilant.local ([fe80::c40d:8140:d722:5448%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Tue, 9 May 2017 10:36:39 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?VIGILANT_Luis_Fern=E1ndez?= To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" Thread-Topic: Re: LF: NA VLF Thread-Index: AQHSyJRzH24LC+DcQE6j3qgyhEHuQ6HrrIrA Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 08:36:38 +0000 Message-ID: <579355A36AEE9D4FA555C45D556003AB8FDD9B58@servigilant.vigilant.local> In-Reply-To: <15bec0dde4e.marcocadeddu@tin.it> Accept-Language: es-ES, en-US Content-Language: es-ES X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.0.2] MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 8ef270cc2ec30cd34b6313d7ada17a45 Subject: RE: Re: LF: NA VLF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lipkowski.org id v498jCej032355 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11643 Congratulations ! Really amazing techniques :-O Add accurate tracking of a (small) dish, and accurate doppler compensation and you will be able to detect the Voyager1 in 8.4GHz ;-) 73 de Luis EA5DOM -----Mensaje original----- De: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] En nombre de marcocadeddu@tin.it Enviado el: martes, 09 de mayo de 2017 9:13 Para: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Asunto: R: Re: LF: NA VLF Hi Joe! compliments for the amazing result! It is really amazing what you are doing on both side of the pond! 73 Marco, IK1HSS ----Messaggio originale---- Da: jcraig@mun.ca Data: 8-mag-2017 22.39 A: Ogg: Re: LF: NA VLF Thank-you Paul. Your RX setup and processing are fantastic. 2.6 electrons on an e probe - that delights me! EbNaut and 100 uW are the next goals. 73 Joe On Mon, 8 May 2017, Paul Nicholson wrote: > > Watson-Watt calculation from the antenna amplitudes and phases of the > overnight signal gives 244 degrees which is reasonable given the > background noise from the south west (pulling the apparent bearing > southwards from the great circle 280 deg). > > Without any calculation, I can see from the relative antenna phases > that the signal is from the west: the E/W H-field is very obviously > inverted (relative to the E-field) from its familiar polarity on > European signals. > > Joe wrote: > >> The carrier was generated with an undisciplined 10 MHz DOCXO clocking >> an ad9851. As Markus points out, the maths puts it high by 92.5 uHz. > > Overnight signal peaks at 8270.0070625 Hz +/- 0.5 uHz. > Therefore about 3.6 ppb low of the DDS nominal frequency of > 8270.0070925... > > If I align the FT bins with that frequency, the overnight signal > becomes a sharp line - > > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170508e.gif > > with a respectable S/N of 13.9 dB in 46.296 uHz. > > I'm now confident that this little peak in the spectrum is 10uW from > VO1NA. Distance is 3545 km. > > The signal amounts to about 2.6 electrons on the E-field probe. > How's that for a signal report Joe? > > Also getting a bit of a signal visible at Forest, Virginia. > Not a very significant peak but it has the same offset. > Only visible on the overnight signal, nothing yet on the daytime. > Distance to Forest is 2442 km so that's very good for a land path. > > http://abelian.org/vlf/tmp/170508d.gif > > Forest is E-field only so no rejection of the South American nighttime > sferics. > > -- > Paul Nicholson > -- > >