Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v49DZf9G000605 for ; Tue, 9 May 2017 15:35:42 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1d85Eg-00063q-66 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 14:31:30 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1d85Ee-00063h-8r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 14:31:28 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22e]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d85Eb-0005Di-F2 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 09 May 2017 14:31:27 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id z52so73324462wrc.2 for ; Tue, 09 May 2017 06:31:25 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=iv2FFaewV5+c/A5WNueeIFZIEL0cRE9vxpVJuQCk8Ew=; b=p9fIie76NXH/sVgGOj+qjwReMQ84MkcTMNYpTvddTBvFmq8UYD8KNtXlykIJ0IhTmY z1whIqv+Q+zEjg3zzLDxXi6cQbVq0QbSaliEJlXm+74yCc/n0eiDELIu9gH6JrlJjqBk 98eTX/RwJpYzYljBAkbmMKTteC2ChkUkM6fTUUg6O9eClE31vGjLHWprWmm+kSyvJ8fx +pODeW38reXfYywS/uLB82BVwDBQuIrzMWK1nYURQiW5Qae+1FR3F/trEkC1ueCpg9nA D7k/ODqxT2Nh+mHFeG/vMPOR6bZHAyBNwpfGltME0VcsyRvv+OrOBeFHdF856pKf0pKK f7NA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=iv2FFaewV5+c/A5WNueeIFZIEL0cRE9vxpVJuQCk8Ew=; b=Cz8Cm597ZpHqvaQObufwJeqDHzF+S7grfANC9sIKaPSRnbG3C/O3I0BogtJoaVD+jl LaSxbzRNR/CLy1xlHWLNasWESjCy7zcbnzel1Vy4qVdlQf8Z1T28SeEIH3NvHdqr1tnu 78Wq+iGOKnHTSpDsBPx+7Z6aU0fv4q0z+IEtX474YqdRxim1aFotim6SIxzLy+1uRfYm iLWUHGyXk7S3HPkg8zxZc2IrH6OAbNWpD2scQQw3BBtrIkZR/lbRnsH7SSegcN5/seZB lygPekCUNCNfCm2byij7GJF3c1+2aAZIH1o9Gmn+WonLKCfqThZMuzHrpD2QapjukTQt mfaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBGDl01EvJ9sFGflUzlnGTO713kgIeAE6aSkeWeqpH/dt2Rx0L6 +TiM8Qho1dAhSuQP X-Received: by 10.223.130.15 with SMTP id 15mr33255wrb.59.1494336683257; Tue, 09 May 2017 06:31:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e67sm193001wma.9.2017.05.09.06.31.22 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 09 May 2017 06:31:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Wilson X-Google-Original-From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 9 May 2017 14:31:21 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1728082795.20170509143121@gmail.com> To: Andy Talbot In-Reply-To: References: <876597267.20170406161946@gmail.com> <8316279A81E04D0BBDCB4504B46041BE@StevePC> <90CAB3E9321F4885BB239619EB9D7F7D@gnat> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: LF: Re: Re: Re: Wilkinson combiners Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11647 Hello Andy, 09 May 2017 I would like to try the transformer coupling, what turns ratio should I use please? I will not try and be too clever and impedance match there as well, i will leave the impedance matching transformer outside by the loading coil for now, so as not to introduce too many variables. Should I be OK winding on a stack of three FT-240 ferrite toroids in 77 material that are in the combiner right now? And finally, apart from the math to work out if a toroid might saturate at a given power level, is their an instrument test to see if that is occurring in real time? Thanks. Best regards, Chris 2E0ILY mailto:chris@gatesgarth.com >> Why not keep it simple, and do it like the Decca transmitters? >> Forget complicated splitters/combiners with messy deliberate >> isolation. You are combining identical signals so that sort of design is not required. >> BEFORE any low pass filters, take each output of each transmitter >> module to separate identical primary windings on one, normal ferrite >> transformer core. Use a single secondary to take the combined power >> off through a low pass filter to your antenna. (But do size the >> core and turns for the TOTAL power to be generated) >> As both transmitter modules will be delivering identical outputs, >> the voltage induced in primary 2 coil from Tx module 1 will be >> exactly equal to the that delivered to it from Tx module 2 (and >> vice versa) so with both transmitters operating correctly, the >> outputs will sum in the secondary. you are adding teh currents >> delivered by each stage, from an equal voltage delivered by both. >> You are, to all intents and purposes, connecting the transmitters in >> parallel to multiply the current delivered in total >> You can use the combining transformer for impedance matching if >> wanted - for example the Decca ones have direct drive to the >> primary windings via a tank circuit and each of the ( In their case >> three) primary to single-secondary turns ration ratio sets the impedance transformation. >> Isolating combiners like Wilkinsons only come into their own >> properly when non-identical signals need to be summed while keeping >> the two sources isolated. Intermod testing in receivers is a >> particular case in point, where the two test signals have to be >> summed without generating their own intermod products caused by the >> output of one source leaking into the (probably non-linear) output >> of the other. If that happened, self-generated IMPS that could swamp those being tested-for. >> Andy G4JNT > -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com