Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,STOX_REPLY_TYPE,STOX_REPLY_TYPE_WITHOUT_QUOTES, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v36GoqcL019568 for ; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 18:50:53 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cwAZA-00057I-OY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:47:24 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cwAZA-000579-FG for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:47:24 +0100 Received: from rgout0301.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.207] helo=rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cwAZ5-0008Qu-Tt for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 06 Apr 2017 17:47:23 +0100 X-OWM-Source-IP: 109.149.170.21 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=8/50,refid=2.7.2:2017.4.6.123019:17:8.707,ip=,rules=NO_URI_FOUND, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND, NO_MESSAGE_ID, NO_URI_HTTPS, TO_MALFORMED Received: from gnat (109.149.170.21) by rgout03.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 58A82A5C054BD4BC for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:47:19 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1491497239; bh=GSaKGdZDndZ6KI2nSACeqk+7UErNXJSbNvVkj/YIi/I=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=vvHdyqtENvYBzS6bMNStChdvfR/qXGi6vAmHnnl8+ucapGNWUeD4S5wm4KcNtXHA1PoK4XxZ490/gMUUhqk+3eXJZ84J3a+jmtskT2QiH8zOVKrhLVYQ0HTYgiftEvRe5+TPaCnhgimxu1gfVLaNqWNharYeqZP88ikg1VvMTw4= Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: <876597267.20170406161946@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 17:24:14 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: 0b36c952c26be93e626fe2fa1c93657f Subject: LF: Re: Wilkinson combiners Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-15"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11124 Chris, the air-cored coils will be less lossy than those with ferrite. I dont think you need worry about lead lengths at these frequencies.(strays are minimal compared with 80uH and 14nF) BUT the coils must not couple together, hence ideally the axes should be at right angles (obviously toroids are easier in this case) It is tempting to build like the circuit but that allows the coils to couple together. Also you MUST feed the ports in phase, and phase error between the amplifiers will mean power lost in the resistor. The 100R resistor should take no power unless one amp dies. They are normally rated at half the output power of one amplifier. Are you sure the Power supply will support supplying two amplifiers without sagging if not the outputs may not look like 50ohms......I am not sure what the effect will be. If you go to toroids you should use "iron dust" not ferrite in my opinion Steve may disagree :-)) The inductance is not so high as to require high permiability ferrite.(you might almost be able to get 80uH on an insulating Tufnol former.) Alan G3NYK ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Wilson" To: Sent: Thursday, April 06, 2017 4:19 PM Subject: LF: Wilkinson combiners Hello LF'ers, I am experimenting with two cheaply made Class D push pull 136kHz amps using very cheap to buy (well under £2 each) FET's combined using a home brew Wilkinson combiner as per this web page. I am using two very big wire wound ceramic resistors of 50 Ohm each in series for "R" which look very very similar to those Steve VE7SL is using in the photo he publishes on this page. http://ve7sl.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/630m-wilkinson-power-combiner.html I used the on line calculator at http://leleivre.com/rf_wilkinson.html to build the air cored coils that are bang on 81.82 uH at 137.55 kHz and caps of 16.4nF (12nF with two 2.2nF in parallel)I used my AIM4170 to check the coil winding with it outputting 137.5 kHz. What I am seeing is each amp giving a nice (well, they seem nice to me...) drain and gate waveforms individually, but when combined both waveforms deteriorate and the cold running FET's and output transformers heat up quite dramatically. I need to rebuild the lashed up combiner with much shorter lead lengths, (for example the caps made from parallelled film caps are across the input and output sockets, and not right by the coil formers, and it's just sat on the bench, not on a ground plane). But are there any other things I need to look at if a tidying it up doesn't fix this? The amps share a common PSU, but have independent driver circuits. W1VD has a different type of combiner, shown here http://www.w1vd.com/137-500-500WCombiner.pdf and I have the ferrites to try this type, but haven't built it yet, what are the merits of each type please? Thanks. 2E0ILY -- Best regards, Chris 2E0ILY