Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v3BArgio029305 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 12:53:44 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cxtN9-0005rD-VH for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:50:07 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cxtN9-0005r4-Ju for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:50:07 +0100 Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cxtN6-0003cH-Bc for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:50:06 +0100 Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id o81so14140485wmb.0 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 03:50:04 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+xO379LMZSvPi6onlMTkpjJFxGaOFlgzzLu7AFdk5fU=; b=vJeVcBaGbvI/Jq4nRDmlnkj9akfiYTW8mDHRQ1HedmSl1km6kcEHYBw9ldA3LSnbmO 7YHk+EmNMt/H7eET8qY6V6ypIcu547kwVn1KFAJV4W8QVB7BF5LYHquv1+rwq0Sv9xH+ VEMPxsAe+RXKtHYj93E4///bV3x4D6Jb1IwS7OqylUbOeoqy381XBtLQ/99e2Na6930j 2rUFPAY1pQtnBE3dcOI0ncLge+kPlHLXVrqvKGv+g1eIPsM6bcNT7kWc0nOX90mSBgkr DzpamxEcPwZ2b/ArUhgHTns529jVTz11Ioo/8njMYUlKYnSnk5QjMmdNrcWHSTPY3g6g VavA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+xO379LMZSvPi6onlMTkpjJFxGaOFlgzzLu7AFdk5fU=; b=G6X1PTxSMroSrGgTQMwG1Ya6zfO0i+ikPY2ei7IRMKutgmAtDKKLgw73T7b13ZIb+0 2L2E6TW2H4418CeZ0uBMXh5A/b+NWsJOWNemdACj5iswj5lvbkNesk4mM+jjrKwXtNli X3J2Au0cRIHJxN3Yfy1gWs1z9AKYsCmstT3+zRuNwErasXZCfxpK3yiGdWYbLz5A2lDn QNUXnUx0lXwBTnFrLi9cmiYYAnfzsNC1JsqDibQfZxzU4YBQzmJdfiHvGo12ZcQE3hzN I1vkC9knnscdpeWTPck4HJ7y3DBKfprV/2UUE4qz2wLA7kTfOwK2knyddYjQX+qmxQYG 6vzA== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6UFaVTvQskdYXqJtLFwj4jBRPnnxmtSIkj4NX2+oWD4GfCcI9XSDglwnrkOmavIw== X-Received: by 10.28.113.135 with SMTP id d7mr4951717wmi.71.1491907802895; Tue, 11 Apr 2017 03:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 198sm1967521wmn.30.2017.04.11.03.50.02 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 03:50:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Wilson X-Google-Original-From: Chris Wilson Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 11:50:01 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <948964339.20170411115001@gmail.com> To: Andy Talbot In-Reply-To: References: <1294128911.20170408174233@gmail.com> <15b4f9773b2-2fd8-bf55@webprd-a08.mail.aol.com> <1316557940.20170410114729@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: 896f9ee4f10c5db37812c155e804756d Subject: Re: LF: Wilkinson combiners - More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by lipkowski.org id v3BArgio029305 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11220 Hello Andy, OK, I can see the elegance in that, but pardon the probably daft question, but at the combining output transformer, is its input taken from my existing output transformers' secondary windings, or do I remove both of those and the combining transformer takes their place? How would I work out what toroid and winding wire to use as a single amp already causes some warming, albeit I believe it is derived from the primary wire, rather than the ferrite itself being heated. Thanks. Monday, April 10, 2017, 7:49:36 PM, you wrote: > Why not keep it simple, and do it like the Decca transmitters?   > Forget complicated splitters/combiners with messy deliberate > isolation.  You are combining identical signals so that sort of design is not required. > BEFORE any low pass filters, take each output of each transmitter > module to separate identical primary windings on one, normal ferrite > transformer core.  Use a single secondary to take the combined power > off through a low pass filter to your antenna.   (But do size the > core and turns for the TOTAL power to be generated) > As both transmitter modules will be delivering identical outputs, > the voltage induced in primary 2 coil from Tx module 1 will be > exactly equal to the that delivered to it from Tx  module 2 (and > vice versa)  so with both transmitters operating correctly, the > outputs will sum in the secondary.    you are adding teh currents > delivered by each stage, from an equal voltage delivered by both.   > You are, to all intents and purposes, connecting the transmitters in > parallel to multiply the current delivered in total > You can use the combining transformer for impedance matching if > wanted - for example the Decca ones  have direct drive to the > primary windings via a tank circuit and each of the ( In their case > three) primary to single-secondary turns ration ratio sets the impedance transformation. > Isolating combiners like Wilkinsons only come into their own > properly when non-identical signals need to be summed while keeping > the two sources isolated.    Intermod testing in receivers is a > particular case in point, where the two test signals have to be > summed without generating their own intermod products caused by  the > output of one source leaking into the (probably non-linear) output > of the other.  If that happened, self-generated IMPS that could swamp those being tested-for. > Andy  G4JNT -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com