Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v3Q6lg7j007090 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 08:47:43 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1d3Gh4-0005iX-Ew for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:44:54 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1d3Gh4-0005iO-6v for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:44:54 +0100 Received: from smtp-out-6.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.70]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d3Gh1-0007DU-LL for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:44:52 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([78.150.101.242]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id 3Gh0dhutAgKst3Gh1dZA3q; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:44:51 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [78.150.101.242] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=GdBVpkfL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=zSPPKdXLYhWsOVDzq1e+mg==:117 a=zSPPKdXLYhWsOVDzq1e+mg==:17 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=0Nt5dd6y_JD6FKQex3cA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 From: g3zjo To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15b9cb3d038-73bd-386c8@webprd-m70.mail.aol.com> <58FDFB35.4090808@posteo.de> Message-ID: <884186ed-4278-0200-9dbb-2727c632b51d@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 07:44:52 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-GB X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170425-2, 25/04/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKkuxrCkhDynwjTN29HVDSsNiZP8f+xGSYD8diq8voHYYls9B17uJUn09hLjkMBwMpYs5lQ0+82YrsfZjv5gJy1qrgXMloQNWRK1IcvLKDleoSF6udE6 EdD/FcgaKO/i53FdZ5DFVxG2FI9jxUG5Lf4QLu1KmW0vBk5fX9OOE3DeOSZzIKkb6mya4ZXs6CaEdQ== X-Scan-Signature: ddae800c6581715278ab3184b42d46db Subject: Re: LF: Re[2]: VLF: New carrier on 6470.005 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11488 On 26/04/2017 07:37, g3zjo wrote: > The bands of QRM are unstable spaced every 100Hz Oops, a 0 slipped to the bottom of the page :-) The bands of QRM are unstable spaced every 1000Hz Eddie