Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v3J8AVIn014924 for ; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 10:10:33 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1d0kdN-000729-Ko for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:06:41 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1d0kcw-000720-Pq for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:06:14 +0100 Received: from smtp-out-6.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.70]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1d0kcq-00012Z-N5 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:06:11 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.3] ([78.150.101.242]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id 0kcpdNOmLgKst0kcpdUAP0; Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:06:07 +0100 X-Originating-IP: [78.150.101.242] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=GdBVpkfL c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=zSPPKdXLYhWsOVDzq1e+mg==:117 a=zSPPKdXLYhWsOVDzq1e+mg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=q2y7LsaD_ZKS6zC9-8cA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=wygtsRLyp0gA:10 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <58F48E7E.17668.80FC91@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <9E7678AF78C14D20B28472DF6749967A@AGB> <58F523AB.16927.6F358B@roelof.ndb.demon.nl> <58F52756.9090301@posteo.de> From: g3zjo Message-ID: <8335a810-b99c-84d5-30f1-b9dd1f7f8e79@psk31.plus.com> Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 09:06:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58F52756.9090301@posteo.de> Content-Language: en-GB X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170418-12, 18/04/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDUmqFh8IC6ZpgJ42dABYUUX9PP1tZfAzFUWX8FHtMjiQ3e+VvGP09lPhulpoZdsWHDsWuTjV2GT9BS+4CyuvRNc6+7UsVocfKqyYQ5ffuT+EVXzmF+M i4+snrd1xIh1DsYjll5p6gtEoX/kwlFt5GWU4gZf+Fir6Tv4OZire08Fr+24V1gO2XVUc2TDAO6oDA== X-Scan-Signature: aee9e5eeb35c86f052d502ac97832558 Subject: Re: VLF: New carrier on 6470.005 Hz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11386 On 17/04/2017 21:36, DK7FC wrote: > I'm still staying at 460 mA antenna current. The actual frequency is > 6470.005000 Hz. Well I thought yesterday that I could see nothing on 6470.005 Hz from that session but looking at my Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm VLF4 maybe there are a few coherent pixels. Not much hope for even 2 symbols of EbNaut though ? 73 Eddie G3ZJO