Message-ID: <58EB96A0.6090106@posteo.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:28:48 +0200
From: DK7FC <selberdenken@posteo.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <58EA2389.9070107@posteo.de> <519a2968-f0e0-e779-a1e9-c3e1e0085ba8@psk31.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <519a2968-f0e0-e779-a1e9-c3e1e0085ba8@psk31.plus.com>
Subject: Re: VLF: DFCW-6000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

Hi Eddie, Paul, Jacek, VLF,

Thanks for watching. I already saw the poor propagation during the first 
element and later the spectrogram slip. So it looks like Paul and Jacek 
could be the only watching stations who can produce a well looking 
spectrogram in the end...
Meanwhile the 7 is completed :-)
73, Stefan


Am 10.04.2017 09:37, schrieb g3zjo:
> Hi Stefan
>
> Conditions are not as good during daylight as when you decided to give 
> DFCW a try in 424 uHz. It will be interesting to see what happens 
> during today.
>
> There was a glitch also at the start from my end. When I arrived home 
> the shack had been locked up and in full sunlight, soundcard error was 
> around 3.7ppm, I decided that was maybe a bit near to 5ppm with the 
> hottest day of the year in progress and upped the limit to 10ppm, not 
> realising that SpecLab would do its funny little scroll forward trick.
>
> Attached is a view of D K - with the gap produced by the scroll cut 
> out. A pretty marginal D, it may have been compressed by the scroll 
> forward, but it is there.
>
> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>
>
> On 09/04/2017 13:05, DK7FC wrote:
>> VLF,
>>
>> Today, 12 UTC, i'm trying to leave my call on G3ZJOs 8270 Hz 424 uHz 
>> grabber. It may be visible on other spectrograms as well...
>>
>> 73, Stefan
>>
>>
>>
>