Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2017 11:34:22 -0400
From: Markus Vester <markusvester@aol.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Message-Id: <15b6d19d9f6-799c-1e02b@webprd-a49.mail.aol.com>
In-Reply-To: <fb290c31-81e4-7b6f-cbeb-ac99564bf9f3@abelian.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; 
	boundary="----=_Part_145180_607342214.1492184062451"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

------=_Part_145180_607342214.1492184062451
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Paul! Yes I intend to leave it on for a while.

I wonder if you could measure the relative phase of Stefan's and my daytime=
 carriers? Although the frequencies are different, the phases are reference=
d to a common timeframe (midnight UT). We have been discussing whether we c=
ould transit simultaneously on the same QRG with appropriately aligned TX p=
hase, increasing the combined signal by ~2 dB.

73, Markus

=20


-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung-----=20
Von: Paul Nicholson <vlf0403@abelian.org>
An: rsgb_lf_group <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Verschickt: Fr, 14. Apr 2017 17:14
Betreff: Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz


Markus wrote:

 > since 13:30 I'm running a carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with 0.21 A.

Looks to be about 0.06 fT here, but not significant against the
noise floor in one hour integration. If you can run for 3 hours
it could show up well.

For comparison, Stefan's (nighttime) 6470 signal is about 0.18 fT.

--
Paul Nicholson
--
------=_Part_145180_607342214.1492184062451
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div style=3D"font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:b=
lack;"><div style=3D"color: black; font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;=
 font-size: 10pt;">Thanks Paul! Yes I intend to leave it on for a while.<br=
><br>I wonder if you could measure the relative phase of Stefan's and my da=
ytime carriers? Although the frequencies are different, the phases are refe=
renced to a common timeframe (midnight UT). We have been discussing whether=
 we could transit simultaneously on the same QRG with appropriately aligned=
 TX phase,&nbsp;increasing the combined signal by ~2 dB.<br><br>73, Markus<=
br><br>&nbsp;<br><br><br>-----Urspr=C3=BCngliche Mitteilung----- <br>Von: P=
aul Nicholson &lt;vlf0403@abelian.org&gt;<br>An: rsgb_lf_group &lt;rsgb_lf_=
group@blacksheep.org&gt;<br>Verschickt: Fr, 14. Apr 2017 17:14<br>Betreff: =
Re: VLF: Carrier on 6470.005 Hz - and 6469.9975 Hz<br><br></div><br>Markus =
wrote:<br><br> &gt; since 13:30 I'm running a carrier on 6469.9975 Hz with =
0.21 A.<br><br>Looks to be about 0.06 fT here, but not significant against =
the<br>noise floor in one hour integration.  If you can run for 3 hours<br>=
it could show up well.<br><br>For comparison, Stefan's (nighttime) 6470 sig=
nal is about 0.18 fT.<br><br>--<br>Paul Nicholson<br>--<br><br></div>
------=_Part_145180_607342214.1492184062451--