Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v35Ca3XK008873 for ; Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:36:04 +0200 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cvk6d-0007Jw-CN for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:32:11 +0100 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cvk6d-0007Jn-2j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:32:11 +0100 Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cvk6X-0002wH-IQ for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:32:09 +0100 Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w11so11731929wrc.3 for ; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:32:05 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=gmail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CVP95MuQNBjnJWlFXwF46Mfl3tmaSY7gs1C/kMREXjY=; b=EGKPHoFzBr6LQ7/7BE8KMqw3t3BEw5i4BHJN9NFwtMSbNh09Cq6mPX17GRvnPwlyr0 rFl5fgpCYTjH83b51YrPHpTmXGdka0g7Psm+eFfp2Rdi31py4x0/HPO2DbQoVnaUk1Du 4b7flz32zOxTSYSHfloxg8tz+P6Z5ezoTBBghZUq9p028+fABdauC076GjJl4f1lZDTI LPoQ7HnQZgvpXP2XgeBcK5t/QJsQVK2pISvil7ibreHJRp4ZUWjmdAdbCysrX9ynbTuB BWvqcMpHYENjlGdFatTsD+hs5pQpLfYaOaxJE0e0NaqUzGEgxY5ijiWaJ5oVL7ikzR2d 9Bvg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:message-id:to:subject:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CVP95MuQNBjnJWlFXwF46Mfl3tmaSY7gs1C/kMREXjY=; b=iEVEDXiL3lA78WjWwAMYoz7XjhaOQ1CHqNn3zF9MbM+75/IkQKnqd2GBqo82diRGge pNCFN4XPI9Doh6nZ0ZGu8UMndKYxFDw2DUnM4BNDT3Co+xOv34I1GMgqACbADQhxhsnC PsQ+KheNrvkW0879D4Euo3KleWmqwGfBNV5pYRzZrJkocJn8FV8wum1c3ZGlCJRRx3nO okJxs8uaxWwLb58zNnPy49gM9ZYWpMPk5uyxYiwVpbv5A4x47d2S+MuaDVUEbl8mvx8x zNGiE2CE9kgPWEireKhfEAeX52DV1r5p0XWjd+XpWzA6gi11Sbm2F2ZWBvLa9aLJ9q7x ih2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H2QuASRJOcv4swhuTLP/qs/jI0zu1KgfBOHPY+JplMbtkftD6I4 v+dRfZZt74do3anz8c4= X-Received: by 10.28.7.13 with SMTP id 13mr19091454wmh.16.1491395523962; Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:32:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from OfficeWin7.lan (82-70-254-222.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.70.254.222]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y66sm6770624wrb.39.2017.04.05.05.32.03 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Apr 2017 05:32:03 -0700 (PDT) From: Chris Wilson X-Google-Original-From: Chris Wilson Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2017 13:32:02 +0100 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1569655395.20170405133202@gmail.com> To: DK7FC In-Reply-To: <58E4DC88.3010404@posteo.de> References: <5872C893.80807@abelian.org> <58755576.6000702@posteo.de> <58E2383D.9040206@posteo.de> <032a01d2acca$09680930$1c381b90$@comcast.net> <58E4DC88.3010404@posteo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scan-Signature: e6de17d69e46ff4ea8db042ef2cd7e46 Subject: Re: ULF: RE: A new distance record on 970 Hz / 309 km band ...earth antennas Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11114 Hello Stefan, Wednesday, April 5, 2017 What impedance did you have to match with such an antenna used for TX Stefan? Congratulations on your remarkable experiments at ULF, I am stunned by what you are achieving "down there"! > Hi Jim, > > Thanks for your comments. You bring me (back) to the idea of using > an earth antenna, this time for receiving. > In 2012 i build up a 700m long wire antenna in the forest. It was > grounded on both ends. I run a few 100 mA into the wire. > One day i put 250 W into the antenna and got 10 dB SNR in 3.8 mHz at 8970 Hz in 45km distance. > I remember G3XBMs blog entry: > http://g3xbm-qrp.blogspot.de/2010/09/vlf-dx-transmission-with-earth.html > That was quite a nice time. Activity was much higher these days, not only on VLF. > I also used the antenna for reception and was impressed by the interesting frequency response. > In the next 970 Hz experiment i want to drive to > http://no.nonsense.ee/qth/map.html?qth=JN49JM36. During the > recording of the E field signals are running i have some time. > During this time i could try to use an earth antenna for ULF > reception. It has the advantage that it is easy to build it up in a > forest. Just 300m length or so. There has always been the discussion > if such an antenna (with grounded ends) acts rather as a loop or as > a dipole on the ground. I would expect a loop and so i will build it up. > Comments/Ideas? > > 73, Stefan > -- Best regards, Chris mailto:dead_fets@gmail.com