Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2A91Wqt021808 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:01:34 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cmGMc-000888-JY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:57:30 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cmGMb-00087z-V9 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:57:29 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-4.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.68]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cmGMZ-00037N-9h for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:57:28 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([78.150.127.92]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id mGMXcuc5LcpskmGMXceUmQ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:57:25 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [78.150.127.92] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=ILRAMUnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ltISPUkTCPavytHNowa71g==:117 a=ltISPUkTCPavytHNowa71g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=vcdbCoJ1_bKKPCIoYtUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> From: g3zjo Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:57:30 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 170309-1, 09/03/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfCscMEIpR8JocEUXqpmnT+4t9R+dl8/OAqvEkBNKEgULPeO1H3gOf0C6bYxHAFgGMb4uMYgX4WtOSyXt7VRjRf9CwSaeEn22YXqOyzRApp3W7VaBfnWa hA9p6buqNKWOZTVnlWR0zvlVtydlafiEG5PiBuxzz+LZaJtSMHekHjf4CbDitqcv7qBgkDRX3QmWow== X-Scan-Signature: 7aa9ad08848e488e22e0ff1d71f4ef1d Subject: Re: VLF: SpecLab old versions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10819 On 10/03/2017 00:15, Markus Vester wrote: > those version and build numbers look odd to me, are you sure you've > got them right? No :-) I should remember never to trust my memory. Correction V2.92 b02 is the newest, I was advised to try V2.90 b20, I only had V2.90 b16 available so stepped back to that. It was my last email late last night, excuses, excuses. I could have checked because they are both on this Laptop also. I have considered V2.92 b02 to be flaky on display from my first use, I mentioned it to Stefan. I had to start afresh with all my .config files it just didn't like my old ones. Something not seen before but happens now on both releases on both machines is, constant messages on start up of "can't find the Pallete" ie Sunrise, the default. Do you see this? I wonder if it indicates that the two versions are using different locations to store display information. I know a lot of set up information is stored in memory. 73 Eddie G3ZJO