To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <15abf7cbaf0-320b-252bd@webprd-m26.mail.aol.com>
From: g3zjo <g3zjo@psk31.plus.com>
Message-ID: <a36f6d6d-faec-0e27-34ee-9c97ace62112@psk31.plus.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 23:36:14 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <15abf7cbaf0-320b-252bd@webprd-m26.mail.aol.com>
Subject: Re: VLF: EbNaut 8270.033333 Hz Saturday
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------68343013900B67368A7D037E"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------68343013900B67368A7D037E
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 11/03/2017 22:28, Markus Vester wrote:
>
>
> thanks for looking! The 5 s symbols would be difficult, it was meant 
> to be a challenge for Paul who miraculously managed to dig it out of 
> the noise.

Yes very short period but you never know.

> On your 47 uHz screen (vlf2.jpg) there are now a couple of suspicious 
> bright pixels on 8270.0025, so maybe there's at least something. If 
> you like you could try to pick up the ongoing overnight EbNaut test (5 
> char, 60s symbols).

Yes that does look promising. I was looking at vl5 on my Grabber for 
you, having moved it up to cover 8270.033, I assumed the carrier would 
be on the same frequency as your EbNaut, I totally ignored this part of 
your message:-
> After a pushing one leg of the antenna a bit further up, I am now 
> sending a carrier on 8270.0025 since 12:00 UT. The signal might 
> be 1 or 2 dB stronger than usual.
Doh !

Yes I will take a look for the overnight EbNaut for sure.

73 Eddie G3ZJO

--------------68343013900B67368A7D037E
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/03/2017 22:28, Markus Vester
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:15abf7cbaf0-320b-252bd@webprd-m26.mail.aol.com"
      type="cite">
      <div
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:black;">
        <div style="color: black; font-family:
          arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><br>
          <br>
          thanks for looking! The 5 s symbols would be difficult, it
          was meant to be a challenge for Paul who miraculously managed
          to dig it out of the noise.<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Yes very short period but you never know.<br>
    <br>
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:15abf7cbaf0-320b-252bd@webprd-m26.mail.aol.com"
      type="cite">
      <div
style="font-size:10pt;font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;color:black;">
        <div style="color: black; font-family:
          arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">On your 47
          uHz screen (vlf2.jpg) there are now a couple of suspicious
          bright pixels on 8270.0025, so maybe there's at least
          something. If you like you could try to pick up the ongoing
          overnight EbNaut test (5 char, 60s symbols).<br>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    Yes that does look promising. I was looking at vl5 on my Grabber for
    you, having moved it up to cover 8270.033, I assumed the carrier
    would be on the same frequency as your EbNaut, I totally ignored
    this part of your message:-<br>
    <blockquote type="cite">After a pushing one leg of the antenna a bit
      further up, I am now sending a carrier on 8270.0025 since 12:00
      UT. The signal might be 1 or 2 dB stronger than usual.</blockquote>
    Doh !<br>
    <br>
    Yes I will take a look for the overnight EbNaut for sure.<br>
    <br>
    73 Eddie G3ZJO<br>
  </body>
</html>

--------------68343013900B67368A7D037E--