Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2L0J2IH028998 for ; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 01:19:04 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cq7RB-0003MP-AY for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:14:09 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cq7Qo-0003MG-05 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:13:46 +0000 Received: from rgout0604.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk ([65.20.0.131] helo=rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cq7Ql-0002GX-7D for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:13:44 +0000 X-OWM-Source-IP: 86.178.235.69 (GB) X-OWM-Env-Sender: alan.melia@btinternet.com X-Junkmail-Premium-Raw: score=12/50,refid=2.7.2:2017.3.20.233917:17:12.455,ip=,rules=__HAS_MSGID, __SANE_MSGID, MSGID_32HEX_LC, INVALID_MSGID_NO_FQDN, __MSGID_32HEX, __HAS_FROM, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL_FROM, __TO_MALFORMED_2, __TO_NO_NAME, __REFERENCES, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT, __MIME_VERSION, __CT, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN, __CTE, __HAS_X_PRIORITY, __HAS_MSMAIL_PRI, __HAS_X_MAILER, USER_AGENT_OE, __OUTLOOK_MUA_1, __USER_AGENT_MS_GENERIC, __ANY_URI, __URI_NO_WWW, __PHISH_SPEAR_REASONS, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE, __INT_PROD_LOC, __FORWARDED_MSG, __NO_HTML_TAG_RAW, BODY_SIZE_3000_3999, __MIME_TEXT_P1, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY, __URI_NS, HTML_00_01, HTML_00_10, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL, MSG_THREAD, LEGITIMATE_SIGNS, __OUTLOOK_MUA, __PHISH_SPEAR_STRUCTURE_1, __MIME_TEXT_P, FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK, REFERENCES, NO_URI_HTTPS, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS Received: from gnat (86.178.235.69) by rgout06.bt.lon5.cpcloud.co.uk (9.0.019.13-1) (authenticated as alan.melia@btinternet.com) id 58BFE0C0015C33FB for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:13:41 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=btinternet.com; s=btcpcloud; t=1490055223; bh=tMXLeEAr8C1NGNMGy/gMmUMeSoZLthbMxAbh1Nlzylc=; h=Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:X-Mailer; b=XIidoneidttz3kabxET60JkFFloTSWf/xTpD17kGKe36LS3X31TIfeYCdMV/vTQcYXQNAIOLHHGxm9lLGBj9phPf27yh+TchUU7ZgguMHHzGhRg+Jm4wVsORkPmpmPIFtDGjPJFqih4lpLntf89NSeGjgKNTHQbUO9NKbyDjDkY= Message-ID: From: "Alan Melia" To: References: Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2017 00:13:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 X-Scan-Signature: 1e15d6d6179985f133b43d42d658878a Subject: LF: Re: problems with mails to the list? Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: A X-Keywords: X-UID: 10942 Jacek, there are a number of possible reasons why messages do not "seem" to go through the mailing list. I write seem in quotes because many do not understand the route the messages take. Also I remind that not receiving your posting back is not proof it did not arrive or that other members did not get it. The situation is massively complicated by the various ISP servers apply their own rules to try to reduce spam. Bounces are generally not received from this group I believe. And undelivered message report is also dumped. One reason is the obvious one of the ease of producing a "ping-pong" effect. There is little problem with UK originated messages though one or two even have problems here. The most often reported losses are from non-UK originators. In many cases we in the UK see the distribution but the originator does not get his posting back. This is aften a function of the ISP who it would seem regards messages to the originator are likely to be spam. I have several cases of this happening with specific ISPs on Yahoo Groups. Some globe-trotting users like Laurence KL7L were unable to post from China. We think this was route blacklisting but having no access to admin we have no way of confirming. All I can say is use text (not HTML) which can confuse the parser, keep messages and particularly attachments below about 200kB (I can't now remember the actual limit....it may be more than this but is certainly not exceeding 500kB). Do not leave the subject line blank if there is an attachment, because this trips up the parser. Make sure you use the exact posting address you subscribed with. I believe gmail and googlemail are regarded as the same but they are two separate addresses to an ancient list-server like this. If the problem continues I suggest re-subscribing with a different address. Now there have been significant delays reported on several lists in the last few days. Yahoo has be delaying occasional messages 3 or 4 days. This can be due to congestion during DDoS attacks. As I said I have no admin access to this server but if the member having problems would like to copy me in on postings to the group, I can check arrival at least. Alan G3NYK Yahoo Group moderator ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jacek Lipkowski" To: Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 10:12 PM Subject: LF: problems with mails to the list? > does anyone have problems sending mail to this list? if so could you > please send me the bounced message that you got (off list of course)? > > one of the members of this list wrote me that he has problems having his > emails accepted since a few days because of problems negotiating tls (so > far we don't know if it's a problem with this list's email servers, or his > provider's email servers. both seem to do tls 1.2 without problem). maybe > this is the reason why this list has less posts lately (summer propagation > on lf/mf might be another reason). > > btw i have never had any problems with emails bouncing or being delayed, > but some people reported it in the past. > > VY 73 > > Jacek / SQ5BPF > >