MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5b20b18e-06fc-6965-34dc-dac06702857b@n1bug.com>
References: <CAL-VeeNiY1-fhHCxgdZ-+GYGGJgzjfmZ0yCF8cXC1KhZQRko_Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <15b0c868a2e-7d4f-1e3d7@webprd-a90.mail.aol.com> <CAL-VeeOTsgmWEdC7nsPSDmCkVZ-vDo96cw7i13AFUMtnP_g-7Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <5b20b18e-06fc-6965-34dc-dac06702857b@n1bug.com>
From: Alex R7NT <r7nt.73@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 10:16:14 +0300
Message-ID: <CAL-VeeP2AvtT+PWvEqAK42POhrxSSo9VYrGFZ0d1JkjD0Ni0yQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Subject: Re: LF: Mar 25-26 Best QRB/reports
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114ea27a1be61d054bd95a6f
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

--001a114ea27a1be61d054bd95a6f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi Paul !
Can you try a simple version WSPR 2.0 or WSPR 4.0 for linux? maybe...
I believe that same as in WSJT - not in WSPR-X
Your results in WSPR2 on 136kHz are very cool with QRPP - DC0DX, G8HUH,
2E0ILY - Congrats !
I don't have any info abt of you RXsetup. Could you be so kind to tell me
abt it

73! Alex R7NT  136.73.ru

2017-03-27 14:22 GMT+03:00 N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>:

> On 03/27/2017 03:08 AM, Alex R7NT wrote:
>
> I'm more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-)
>> What are the ideas about this?
>>
>> I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in
>> the usual propagation
>>
>
> Hi Alex.
>
> I am very interested in WSPR15.
>
> Unfortunately the only WSPR15 decoder seems to be WSPR-X software which
> many of us cannot use. It is always crashing, freezing, stopping on many
> PCs.
>
> If someday the developers put WSPR15 in the stable WSJT-X software (or
> someone writes another decoder software) then I think it has a chance to
> become more popular. I am waiting!
>
> When (if) there is a stable decoder I will listen for WSPR15 in parallel
> with WSPR2.
>
> 73,
> Paul N1BUG / WI2XTC
> FN55mf

--001a114ea27a1be61d054bd95a6f
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr">Hi Paul !<div>Can you try a simple version WSPR 2.0 or WSP=
R 4.0 for linux? maybe...</div><div>I believe that same as in WSJT - not in=
 WSPR-X</div><div>Your results in WSPR2 on 136kHz are very cool with QRPP -=
 DC0DX, G8HUH, 2E0ILY - Congrats !</div><div>I don&#39;t have any info abt =
of you RXsetup. Could you be so kind to tell me abt it</div><div><br></div>=
<div>73! Alex R7NT =C2=A0<a href=3D"http://136.73.ru/" target=3D"_blank">13=
6.73.ru</a><br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">2017-03-27 14:22 GMT+03:00 N1BUG <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailt=
o:paul@n1bug.com" target=3D"_blank">paul@n1bug.com</a>&gt;</span>:<br><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:=
1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"gmail-">On 03/2=
7/2017 03:08 AM, Alex R7NT wrote:<br>
<br>
</span><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;=
border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><span class=3D"gma=
il-">
I&#39;m more interested in WSPR15 vs WSPR2 vs OP32 :-)<br>
What are the ideas about this?<br>
<br></span><span class=3D"gmail-">
I believe WSPR15 is better against WSPR2 on LF for long distances in<br>
the usual propagation<br>
</span></blockquote>
<br>
Hi Alex.<br>
<br>
I am very interested in WSPR15.<br>
<br>
Unfortunately the only WSPR15 decoder seems to be WSPR-X software which man=
y of us cannot use. It is always crashing, freezing, stopping on many PCs.<=
br>
<br>
If someday the developers put WSPR15 in the stable WSJT-X software (or some=
one writes another decoder software) then I think it has a chance to become=
 more popular. I am waiting!<br>
<br>
When (if) there is a stable decoder I will listen for WSPR15 in parallel wi=
th WSPR2.<br>
<br>
73,<br>
Paul N1BUG / WI2XTC<br>
FN55mf</blockquote></div><div class=3D"gmail_signature"><div dir=3D"ltr"><b=
r></div></div>
</div></div>

--001a114ea27a1be61d054bd95a6f--