Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2MATRG7031248 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 11:29:29 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cqdSb-0004et-Pd for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:45 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cqdSZ-0004ek-3G for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:43 +0000 Received: from porthos.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.73]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cqdSV-0000vD-R0 for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:41 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=abelian.org Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=vTXdG1OX7Y2JVi/8Il/yTC7fGNxfseuR/NzQhDraBtQ=; b=q3j8sSTdk23TFiZivShIzlpsRI 26kXWnZulPUTlcKvZ3adaRVqJIhGjj+lGlWeXA3F8pimh27+PMDe+8LISf3Xg7CK6whjz/1hwEhVK 4w+UpECCe83psQya63dMJPgkIs/Ph2cMn7wxSWe6c3pF9Bv52SOQiSvoTvkfrZGTrjrk=; Received: from i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.52.83]:50674 helo=pn.abelian.org) by porthos.netcom.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.88) (envelope-from ) id 1cqdST-0002ko-0b for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:37 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pn.abelian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146DB400043 for ; Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:35 +0000 (UTC) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de> <58C2E24C.6020409@posteo.de> <58C7E621.3000906@posteo.de> <8a2c82ce-ba0a-de45-25d5-1c155165b3ed@psk31.plus.com> <0d073f34-795a-628d-db68-77f5e7336eea@abelian.org> <61c49d39-3794-ba91-0057-c9606788471a@abelian.org> <51c13f4c-b432-e967-2a38-971b265e5eb0@abelian.org> <5fae97ad-9e53-467b-2655-8f3967a1304b@abelian.org> <58D23E73.7090201@gmail.com> From: Paul Nicholson Message-ID: <9940b1f3-2fdb-01df-6c41-463a63d3119a@abelian.org> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:25:35 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58D23E73.7090201@gmail.com> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - porthos.netcom.co.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - blacksheep.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - abelian.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: porthos.netcom.co.uk: authenticated_id: catchall@abelian.org X-Authenticated-Sender: porthos.netcom.co.uk: catchall@abelian.org X-Scan-Signature: 5c335215f1b3de26d890ee84d49616ce Subject: Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10976 Stefan wrote: > Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something > elso than my signal?? Well I don't know. It would be an extraordinary achievement for your 2970 signal to reach this far. It needs a result that can stand up to scrutiny. I'd like to do some more work with it to get an unequivocal detection at 5 sigma. > I'm going to run the carrier another few days, at least > until friday, A few more days signal will help. Adding 21st didn't improve the peak, nor did the blanker settings I left running last night. For these runs I am blanking each antenna channel independently, then mixing and phasing. Usually I do the mixing first and blank the composite signal. While one channel is blanked and another isn't, the mix is wrong. That ought to be worse than blanking after the mix. With less than 5% blanking factor it might not be much of an issue either way. I can also look again at your previous 2970 tests, stacking the same 14:00 to 19:00 window. -- Paul Nicholson --