Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,URIBL_SBL,URIBL_SBL_A autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2ADT46K023301 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:29:05 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cmKY1-0000sY-I8 for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:25:33 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cmKY1-0000sP-8B for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:25:33 +0000 Received: from smtp-out-4.talktalk.net ([62.24.135.68]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1cmKXw-0003z6-9j for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:25:32 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([78.150.127.92]) by smtp.talktalk.net with SMTP id mKXucvJ93cpskmKXvcem5F; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:25:27 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [78.150.127.92] X-Spam: 0 X-OAuthority: v=2.2 cv=ILRAMUnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ltISPUkTCPavytHNowa71g==:117 a=ltISPUkTCPavytHNowa71g==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=nN7BH9HXAAAA:8 a=KPlHJ1Yaax3XfHwt79AA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=wygtsRLyp0gA:10 a=wQf5WvvPLwzY6UdiLRIz:22 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de> From: g3zjo Message-ID: <67663020-0c27-d234-815f-2107f8783c7b@psk31.plus.com> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:25:31 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de> X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 170310-0, 10/03/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfBxckW09SiQeimMQy4IAW2cJrMNhX0dtX96Nj6EBb1SnVlwWHh9rBxGNeR7A8D99Zzn1MOFIG0tnh+LZ4j2AlzZT06W+DKAPd8705aKap5o6AfLePxHg eZg9s2/qJXCChD/UNXaQQSkySZbnefRRDI+iHQ50xZfvre616BRylHGBFogFub9MASqgYw0DBBwH6g== X-Scan-Signature: 0317e2ac8ed27149e57223a21580246d Subject: Re: VLF: SpecLab old versions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10824 Hi Wolf Thanks for the comment. So we may be getting somewhere, my SpecLab is always installed outside the Windows/Programs folder, in C:/Comms, where all my Radio stuff is. Both Windows7 and Windows10 complain on start up of not being able to find the colour palette files. However until I installed V2.92 on Win10 I didn't see this, after adding V2.92, V2.90 throws up the message also. Maybe win7-on has some oddity. Well I don't like Windows either, XP was OK, but K1JT software now crashes the computer and locks it up, other stuff has stopped support for XP. I was very cautious about Win 10 because of all the scare stories, however by golly it is good. I just checked the shack machine which has captures on my VLF Grabber http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm and all 9 instances are running fine so no more clues from this end. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 10/03/2017 12:36, Wolfgang Büscher wrote: > Hi Eddie and all, > > If SL is unable to load the colour palette files, you should try > installing it in a folder *outside* the usual 'programs'-thingy in > windows. Quite likely the hyper-nervous 'operating system' doesn't > grant file access to that folder, and all sub-folders. > > Anyway, I've got a slow old PC where I installed windoze 10. I still > hate it (the "OS", not the PC) but maybe at given time, I will install > the C compiler there and try to debug it. I cannot promise anything > yet, because I am quite fed up with windows at the moment. > > Cheers, > Wolf DL4YHF . > > Am 10.03.2017 um 09:57 schrieb g3zjo: >> On 10/03/2017 00:15, Markus Vester wrote: >>> those version and build numbers look odd to me, are you sure you've >>> got them right? >> >> No :-) >> >> I should remember never to trust my memory. Correction V2.92 b02 is >> the newest, I was advised to try V2.90 b20, I only had V2.90 b16 >> available so stepped back to that. >> It was my last email late last night, excuses, excuses. I could have >> checked because they are both on this Laptop also. I have considered >> V2.92 b02 to be flaky on display from my first use, I mentioned it to >> Stefan. I had to start afresh with all my .config files it just >> didn't like my old ones. >> Something not seen before but happens now on both releases on both >> machines is, constant messages on start up of "can't find the >> Pallete" ie Sunrise, the default. Do you see this? I wonder if it >> indicates that the two versions are using different locations to >> store display information. I know a lot of set up information is >> stored in memory. >> >> 73 Eddie G3ZJO >> > > >