From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>
Message-ID: <58DBC17F.9070406@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:15:27 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
References: <15b1492292b.marcocadeddu@tin.it> <58DAACFB.9010406@gmail.com> <58DAAD53.8050503@gmail.com> <1bd9e260-9c95-d4b3-6c4d-3d1a353a2eb9@psk31.plus.com>
In-Reply-To: <1bd9e260-9c95-d4b3-6c4d-3d1a353a2eb9@psk31.plus.com>
Subject: Re: LF: Re: New carrier on 8270.005 Hz
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------070500030503010908020304"
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: O

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------070500030503010908020304
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi Eddie,

Also thanks for watching! Where can i see the trace? A link or a screenshot?

Yes the plan is to wind smaller stacks that allow various combinations 
and resonance frequencies. Also i thought about cutting the tube in the 
center and to insert a blank piece of tube, so the stacks can have a 
selectable spacing. This would be an advantage because letting a stack 
out of the stacked stacks ( :-) ) also reduces the overall voltage 
capability.
Yesterday i removed the faulty stack, the first step of the repair 
process. The fault was quite in the center BTW. This can be expected 
because the flux is highest in the center of the coil and so the voltage 
per turn or per layer. It took me 2.5 hours to carefully remove the 
wire. I will use it again for the new improved stack(s).

73, Stefan

Am 29.03.2017 09:50, schrieb g3zjo:
>
> Hi Stefan
>
> Nice to see some signal again < 9kHz, it makes the electricity bill 
> worthwhile.
>
> Your signal 10dB above the noise peaks in 47uHz here. Also a nice line 
> in 424uHz as usual.
>
> I did wonder if with a part of the 2kHz coil defunct and under rewind 
> maybe the resonance was going to be around 5kHz, pre warnings please 
> for any frequencies that may appear and are not currently being grabbed.
>
> 73 Eddie G3ZJO
>
>
> On 28/03/2017 19:37, DK7FC wrote:
>> PS: The carrier is on the air since 18:08 UTC.
>>
>> Am 28.03.2017 20:35, schrieb DK7FC:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Just in case someone new or old wants to try, i'm running *700 mA 
>>> again on 8270.005 Hz until 05:30 UTC*.
>>> It is a first test for a new RX stn on VLF! If the trace will become 
>>> visible, it would be a new personal distance record < 9 kHz for me :-)
>>>
>>> It is still to early to hope much, no GPS module is available so far.
>>>
>>> But i can tell you i have been in contact wil RC4HAA (club station) 
>>> in LO53CF! See their grabber (running on VLF since a few days) at 
>>> http://www.136.su/grabber/
>>> A GPS module with PPS+NMEA will be available in a few days...
>>>
>>> 73, Stefan
>

--------------070500030503010908020304
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Hi Eddie, <br>
<br>
Also thanks for watching! Where can i see the trace? A link or a
screenshot?<br>
<br>
Yes the plan is to wind smaller stacks that allow various combinations
and resonance frequencies. Also i thought about cutting the tube in the
center and to insert a blank piece of tube, so the stacks can have a
selectable spacing. This would be an advantage because letting a stack
out of the stacked stacks ( :-) ) also reduces the overall voltage
capability.<br>
Yesterday i removed the faulty stack, the first step of the repair
process. The fault was quite in the center BTW. This can be expected
because the flux is highest in the center of the coil and so the
voltage per turn or per layer. It took me 2.5 hours to carefully remove
the wire. I will use it again for the new improved stack(s).<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
Am 29.03.2017 09:50, schrieb g3zjo:
<blockquote
 cite="mid:1bd9e260-9c95-d4b3-6c4d-3d1a353a2eb9@psk31.plus.com"
 type="cite">
  <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
  <p>Hi Stefan<br>
  </p>
  <p>Nice to see some signal again &lt; 9kHz, it makes the electricity
bill worthwhile.</p>
  <p>Your signal 10dB above the noise peaks in 47uHz here. Also a nice
line in 424uHz as usual.<br>
  </p>
  <p>I did wonder if with a part of the 2kHz coil defunct and under
rewind maybe the resonance was going to be around 5kHz, pre warnings
please for any frequencies that may appear and are not currently being
grabbed.</p>
  <p>73 Eddie G3ZJO<br>
  </p>
  <br>
  <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 28/03/2017 19:37, DK7FC wrote:<br>
  </div>
  <blockquote cite="mid:58DAAD53.8050503@gmail.com" type="cite">
    <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
PS: The carrier is on the air since 18:08 UTC.<br>
    <br>
Am 28.03.2017 20:35, schrieb DK7FC:
    <blockquote cite="mid:58DAACFB.9010406@gmail.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <title></title>
Hi all, <br>
      <br>
Just in case someone new or old wants to try, i'm running <b>700 mA
again on 8270.005 Hz until 05:30 UTC</b>. <br>
It is a first test for a new RX stn on VLF! If the trace will become
visible, it would be a new personal distance record &lt; 9 kHz for me
:-)<br>
      <br>
It is still to early to hope much, no GPS module is available so far.<br>
      <br>
But i can tell you i have been in contact wil RC4HAA (club station) in
LO53CF! See their grabber (running on VLF since a few days) at <a
 moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
 href="http://www.136.su/grabber/">http://www.136.su/grabber/</a><br>
A GPS module with PPS+NMEA will be available in a few days...<br>
      <br>
73, Stefan<br>
    </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  <br>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>

--------------070500030503010908020304--