Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN, FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: dcc1: mailn 1182; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v2OLqT5v002277 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:52:30 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1crX5M-0006d6-Gv for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:49:28 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1crX5L-0006cx-9e for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:49:27 +0000 Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <73dk7fc@googlemail.com>) id 1crX5H-0000GD-Pk for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 21:49:25 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id n11so1936699wma.0 for ; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:49:23 -0700 (PDT) X-DKIM-Result: Domain=googlemail.com Result=Good and Known Domain DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jODtwaBJ3mpHibzmleV4yXldu0JD3vof9r/bOXH+qh0=; b=unYJAfAt2ofrE9u4Ammeg738lRGBZFerJ7LjNNkcszfRW7PrWSxP3EHJURQujPg1ms /Dm2HH2DOoUR2cdoBbet6qlXdAjBHGGhkM685H55hR18cvzUixX+PkrghNAIfchIqSJF +CbLi5qM7T0s6YLxyJXUmIyYajFsCYgEztM+CH+QGziY7z5OReEvibnmEWzsQaTBugDh eVAEN29xiCBekAHr2AHKaoYYCIl7UARiQJNJIjNphMzxf32+C3x1aI9T8XS1z/r2k67Z TrlUdonXNgBQwf6VZz2H6DriEL8gps+jyRTzw7ta+P/uKElbhU6Om1UvXNWZfe8xF348 YYpA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:to :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=jODtwaBJ3mpHibzmleV4yXldu0JD3vof9r/bOXH+qh0=; b=M+IPTk5DodJS8OQPh9JROCzG2PhWCyWr/e0Eo595Cw45PgUDsjWprVnVtVKT1Ix7ec KqbWPf9yKFp+AUF7MkUBF3S43UigcMLiILAxC7VE715Zw3x8/wQ31myC7do5pA/3Berd LPF2oaL57sp+PatS/qb2RKGIDYyNuxRNn2VGJIZE07+ko8EfzFyIkha3agkcuMLBxDP5 IUH6g+78klThdo3/oOaDIGRyUlgqc4D/taBb9DMCJBOLJ6EjsG/xObJGWCZ+q2wq9lDm +hDqIc0ph05HKzKP4j/wAAl2gFU9OyiuenTeAM6PZ28ZfiyF/0HemdGAPp+hFyXlupCP 3lFg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H1rjAXeEzAeK7WWpLiTJnCt6wr4H/vCRSD/odoncIICvCYmrr+PH82Iq7ucrN+4lg== X-Received: by 10.28.175.11 with SMTP id y11mr4857011wme.2.1490392162944; Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [129.206.22.206] (pc206.iup.uni-heidelberg.de. [129.206.22.206]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n187sm3969340wmd.4.2017.03.24.14.49.22 for (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 14:49:22 -0700 (PDT) From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@googlemail.com> X-Google-Original-From: DK7FC <73dk7fc@gmail.com> Message-ID: <58D59461.40908@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 22:49:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <15ab5924c85-6837-1eec0@webprd-a101.mail.aol.com> <6f50fc19-4302-204c-d14f-deb705f76601@freenet.de> <58C2E24C.6020409@posteo.de> <58C7E621.3000906@posteo.de> <8a2c82ce-ba0a-de45-25d5-1c155165b3ed@psk31.plus.com> <0d073f34-795a-628d-db68-77f5e7336eea@abelian.org> <61c49d39-3794-ba91-0057-c9606788471a@abelian.org> <51c13f4c-b432-e967-2a38-971b265e5eb0@abelian.org> <5fae97ad-9e53-467b-2655-8f3967a1304b@abelian.org> <58D23E73.7090201@gmail.com> <9940b1f3-2fdb-01df-6c41-463a63d3119a@abelian.org> <58D278E2.4070300@gmail.com> <02a801d2a41f$c056ef70$4104ce50$@comcast.net> In-Reply-To: <02a801d2a41f$c056ef70$4104ce50$@comcast.net> X-Scan-Signature: f1498eebf16822c5ea85527a90413169 Subject: Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 11009 Hi Jim, ULF, i wondered why the trace at IK1QFK in 5 wavelengths distance becaome so blurry in the recent days. See http://www.webalice.it/rromero/live_cumiana/last-LFtest_2970.jpg and use a zoom function :-) The SNR of the next upper bin (5.06 uHz 'higher') reached the same levels and sometimes even more! The overall SNR was increased significantly, to up to 14 dB. Could this have to do with enhanced sky-wave propagation? During the same time the signal became smaller at Paul's location... I'm looking forward to the new VLF/ULF grabber at DL0AO, the are having progress in beg steps! Impressive. It will certainly help to permanently inspect the signal out of different locations... 73, Stefan Am 23.03.2017 22:52, schrieb hvanesce@comcast.net: > Geomagnetic K-index elevated March 21 through March 23, approximately 3< Kp< 4 but higher in Europe with levels at Wingst and Niemegk varying by 50nT to 80nT at times during that period. > > Mentioning this in case it applies to received phase of the 2970 signal. > > But now wondering if this disturbance should be thought of as cause or effect, with 2970 TX currents having grown to 180 mA. > > Jim AA5BW > > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org [mailto:owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org] On Behalf Of DK7FC > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 9:15 AM > To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org > Subject: Re: ULF: New carrier near 2970 Hz... > > Hi Paul, > > Interesting. Do you also use the noise normalisation function which proved to be useful in recent stackings on 5170 Hz? > > Still a few weeks before the 6 channel input soundcard for the Raspi appears... > > 73, Stefan > > Am 22.03.2017 11:25, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > >> Stefan wrote: >> >> >>> Isn't it extremely unlikely that this is something elso than my >>> signal?? >>> >> Well I don't know. It would be an extraordinary achievement for your >> 2970 signal to reach this far. It needs a result >> that can stand up to scrutiny. I'd like to do some more >> work with it to get an unequivocal detection at 5 sigma. >> >> >>> I'm going to run the carrier another few days, at least until >>> friday, >>> >> A few more days signal will help. Adding 21st didn't >> improve the peak, nor did the blanker settings I left running last >> night. >> >> For these runs I am blanking each antenna channel independently, then >> mixing and phasing. Usually I do the mixing first and blank the >> composite signal. >> While one channel is blanked and another isn't, the mix is wrong. >> That ought to be worse than blanking after the mix. With less than 5% >> blanking factor it might not be much of an issue either way. >> >> I can also look again at your previous 2970 tests, stacking the same >> 14:00 to 19:00 window. >> >> -- >> Paul Nicholson >> -- >> >> > >