Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v13DfDIr020816 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 14:41:14 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1cZe3q-00045o-5N for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:37:58 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1cZe3p-00045f-Lb for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:37:57 +0000 Received: from porthos.netcom.co.uk ([217.72.171.73]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cZe3n-0005sd-7r for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:37:56 +0000 X-DKIM-Result: Domain=abelian.org Result=Signature OK DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=abelian.org ; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Sender:Reply-To:Cc: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=thmECjwRvQYfdQLK1DqpwSI35DR9XGpVEjeel5Iet7g=; b=dStFsGeoq16oLO4+uUO0ckplid sx1se7cMQNLontLbrV5HNA8k0EvHDckJtfxvYAiAXdRSqyxa6/xAF/1wAomzK0YZgj8J8ML6+fxmQ rH8jr4rwoW7DxxAzMSn0Z3/Um1EnnUwUrLqHA97/nttDnE1i16dpoUUFMdw8hjyv+nns=; Received: from i-194-106-52-83.freedom2surf.net ([194.106.52.83]:54681 helo=pn.abelian.org) by porthos.netcom.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cZe3m-0000LA-Hd for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Fri, 03 Feb 2017 13:37:54 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pn.abelian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84634004FD for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:37:53 +0000 (UTC) To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <159c6d4aa99-2cc9-11356@webprd-m36.mail.aol.com> <5884E0D8.1090102@abelian.org> <5885FBEE.3060408@posteo.de> <58861BDF.8010605@posteo.de> <58875792.7020302@posteo.de> <58879804.7010301@abelian.org> <5887ACEB.2000207@posteo.de> <5888EEDA.6070308@abelian.org> <588DE1EE.3050408@posteo.de> <588E25B1.8010009@abelian.org> <0af401d27d92$a83d69e0$f8b83da0$@comcast.net> <0b7201d27e1c$3df842f0$b9e8c8d0$@comcast.net> From: Paul Nicholson Message-ID: Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2017 13:37:53 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0b7201d27e1c$3df842f0$b9e8c8d0$@comcast.net> X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - porthos.netcom.co.uk X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - blacksheep.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - abelian.org X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: porthos.netcom.co.uk: authenticated_id: catchall@abelian.org X-Authenticated-Sender: porthos.netcom.co.uk: catchall@abelian.org X-Scan-Signature: 5c1f37c04fc013ebbc2288fd3791d043 Subject: Re: ULF: EbNaut over 3 wavelengths on ULF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10464 I'm surprised at the depth of the dips in the FDTD plots, is the amplitude scale correct? The FDTD results are consistent with my complete inability to detect anything of the 2970 Hz signal here, whereas 5170 Hz is quite easy to receive. It also suggests it would still not work at 2570 Hz but we should get a result at 4390 Hz. Currently, still nothing from Stefan's 2970 carrier in 48 hours, 5.8uHz bandwidth down to 0.01 fT. Not the slightest hint of signal. Stefan, maybe you want to try a higher frequency? 4390 not so good here but the range 4370 to 4380 is ok, 4378 looks best of all. -- Paul Nicholson --