MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <15a31cd3aae.marcocadeddu@tin.it>
References: <15a31cd3aae.marcocadeddu@tin.it>
From: Roger Lapthorn <rogerlapthorn@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 10:28:50 +0000
Message-ID: <CAHAQVWMc2=Y6Jc20gq5mrtHTw0hRLAD3xvO=7e3ig9Aq_L+9rw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org" <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
Subject: Re: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not?
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1147e7365be3bf0548a3437a
Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org
Status: RO

--001a1147e7365be3bf0548a3437a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

All we ask is avoid 82Hz, so you don't start WW3 by accident :-)

BTW, well done!

73s Roger G3XBM

On 12 February 2017 at 10:10, marcocadeddu@tin.it <marcocadeddu@tin.it>
wrote:

>
> Hi Stefan,
>
> where do you qsy next? :-) the dreamer band is now no longer a dream ;-
> )
> are you winding a new coil for 77 Hz band?
> gosh.. 3800 km of wavelenght!
> Leaving the jokes .. again compliments for the new
> achievement, although on the theory there is nothing new I can't avoid
> to be still fascinated from the fact that a so small change in one
> place can induce a detectable change so far away... it is almost like
> the butterfly from the Amazonic forest...
> Keep on Stefan we are awaiting for a new detection in a more remote
> place, anybody 10 lambda away listening?
> 73 Marco IK1HSS
> ----Messaggio originale----
> Da: selberdenken@posteo.de
> Data: 11-feb-2017 23.28
> A: <rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org>
> Cc: "Renato Romero"<contact@vlf.it>
> Ogg: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? Valid or not?
>
> Hi Markus, Paul, Eddie, Marco, Jim, Renato,
>
> thanks for the positive feedback.
>
> Am 11.02.2017 15:22, schrieb g3zjo:
> >
> > I am convinced, but do it again.
> >
> Yes, i will do it again on another frequency. Hopefully the QRN stays
> low for some time longer. Or i have to add more power! Hmmm, critical,
> maybe.
>
> Am 11.02.2017 16:55, schrieb Paul Nicholson:
> > 2970 is the strongest line.  At least 3 sigma, maybe 4,
> > depending on how you treat the lumpy floor.  A physicist
> > would insist on 5 sigma but the fact that the peak is
> > at exactly the right frequency is significant in itself.
> >
> > Markus just wrote:
> >
> > > In my humble opinion, this is clearly a successful
> > > detection.
> >
> > I was doubtful looking at the spectrogram but having
> > plotted the pixels I am convinced.
> >
> > Best I can get in Todmorden is 2 and a bit sigma
> > using just the daytime signal in 3.9 uHz.  Not
> > significant at all.  Would need at least another 7
> > days of transmission.
> How does that peak look so far, in a spectrum? What happens if you put
> day and night together, maybe with some phase correction?
>
> 73, Stefan
>
>
>
>
>
>

--001a1147e7365be3bf0548a3437a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div>All we ask is avoid 82Hz, so you don&#39;t start WW3 =
by accident :-)</div><div><br></div><div>BTW, well done!</div><div><br></di=
v><div>73s Roger G3XBM</div></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><div class=
=3D"gmail_quote">On 12 February 2017 at 10:10, <a href=3D"mailto:marcocaded=
du@tin.it">marcocadeddu@tin.it</a> <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:=
marcocadeddu@tin.it" target=3D"_blank">marcocadeddu@tin.it</a>&gt;</span> w=
rote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;borde=
r-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Hi Stefan,<br>
<br>
where do you qsy next? :-) the dreamer band is now no longer a dream ;-<br>
)<br>
are you winding a new coil for 77 Hz band?<br>
gosh.. 3800 km of wavelenght!<br>
Leaving the jokes .. again compliments for the new<br>
achievement, although on the theory there is nothing new I can&#39;t avoid<=
br>
to be still fascinated from the fact that a so small change in one<br>
place can induce a detectable change so far away... it is almost like<br>
the butterfly from the Amazonic forest...<br>
Keep on Stefan we are awaiting for a new detection in a more remote<br>
place, anybody 10 lambda away listening?<br>
<span>73 Marco IK1HSS<br>
----Messaggio originale----<br>
</span>Da: <a href=3D"mailto:selberdenken@posteo.de">selberdenken@posteo.de=
</a><br>
Data: 11-feb-2017 23.28<br>
A: &lt;<a href=3D"mailto:rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org">rsgb_lf_group@blacks=
heep.org</a>&gt;<br>
Cc: &quot;Renato Romero&quot;&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:contact@vlf.it">contact@=
vlf.it</a>&gt;<br>
<span class=3D"im HOEnZb">Ogg: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on the 101 km band? V=
alid or not?<br>
<br>
</span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">Hi Markus, Paul, Eddie, Marc=
o, Jim, Renato,<br>
<br>
thanks for the positive feedback.<br>
<br>
Am 11.02.2017 15:22, schrieb g3zjo:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I am convinced, but do it again.<br>
&gt;<br>
Yes, i will do it again on another frequency. Hopefully the QRN stays<br>
low for some time longer. Or i have to add more power! Hmmm, critical,<br>
maybe.<br>
<br>
Am 11.02.2017 16:55, schrieb Paul Nicholson:<br>
&gt; 2970 is the strongest line.=C2=A0 At least 3 sigma, maybe 4,<br>
&gt; depending on how you treat the lumpy floor.=C2=A0 A physicist<br>
&gt; would insist on 5 sigma but the fact that the peak is<br>
&gt; at exactly the right frequency is significant in itself.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Markus just wrote:<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; &gt; In my humble opinion, this is clearly a successful<br>
&gt; &gt; detection.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I was doubtful looking at the spectrogram but having<br>
&gt; plotted the pixels I am convinced.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Best I can get in Todmorden is 2 and a bit sigma<br>
&gt; using just the daytime signal in 3.9 uHz.=C2=A0 Not<br>
&gt; significant at all.=C2=A0 Would need at least another 7<br>
&gt; days of transmission.<br>
How does that peak look so far, in a spectrum? What happens if you put<br>
day and night together, maybe with some phase correction?<br>
<br>
73, Stefan<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br></div>

--001a1147e7365be3bf0548a3437a--