Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: EATSERVER: mailn 1166; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v1RBlXiQ011817 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:47:34 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1ciJhx-0004aQ-7e for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:43:13 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1ciJhw-0004aH-7K for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:43:12 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1ciJht-0000fh-Gi for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 11:43:11 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B657620985 for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:43:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vX0Fl1tB4z105n for ; Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:43:07 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <58B410CA.8020003@posteo.de> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2017 12:43:06 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <58A6F8AF.70304@posteo.de> <58A8185E.600@posteo.de> <58A94DB4.7020005@posteo.de> <3ad8f7b7-5cbc-10c6-6816-a382ef25b29f@psk31.plus.com> <5F78A5280BA3412B9829C1E042E77593@AGB> <58A9A118.7050000@posteo.de> <58AAFE11.4060305@posteo.de> <58AC3E1C.8020800@posteo.de> <58ADAE49.6040608@posteo.de> <58ADE1B8.10009@posteo.de> <454f12d8-e89e-9f67-81fa-7de7891eefd1@psk31.plus.com> <58AED3A0.7010706@posteo.de> <58AEDCFC.9080202@posteo.de> <58AF25B4.80304@posteo.de> <58AF273B.6020800@posteo.de> <58AF3677.7080205@posteo.de> <58B04028.9070505@posteo.de> <58B041D4.5050304@posteo.de> <58B1C07D.7040901@posteo.de> <58B2B60C.2030803@posteo.de> In-Reply-To: X-Scan-Signature: 131286aabc28dd54c072e5e89638c651 Subject: Re: VLF: A weekend for newcomers and advanced newcomers... Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010802040704050104040604" X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: RO X-Status: A X-Keywords: X-UID: 10734 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010802040704050104040604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello Eddie, I confirm the message :-) Thanks for the feedback, always good to know the message went out as expected. BTW it is useful to run the decode process until it is completed (= 25%, at 30 deg steps) because there can be better results, with another phase combination which gives a better Eb/N0. The best result is always interesting because then we know how far we are from the limit... It looks like the QRN was relatively high last night. 73, Stefan Am 27.02.2017 09:15, schrieb g3zjo: > > Good decode of the 12 Chr. message in Northampton UK IO92ng. Message > *XXXXXXXXXXXX* PM sent to HQ for confirmation. > > found XXXXXXXXXXXX > list rank 1005 > reference phase 30 30 30 30 > carrier RMS 4.796e-005 noise RMS 6.007e-006 > carrier S/N 18.04 dB in 24.6 uHz > carrier Es/N0 -14.25 dB > carrier Eb/N0 -0.31 dB > info bit period 595.09 seconds > symbol error rate 668/1696 = 39.387 % > Es/N0 from symbol errors -14.4 dB > Eb/N0 from symbol errors -0.5 dB > Shannon capacity 8.0 bits/hour > Shannon efficiency 75.8 % > elapsed 55 seconds > > > On 26/02/2017 11:03, DK7FC wrote: >> >> *f = 8270.100000 Hz >> Start time: Sunday 26.Feb.2017 18:00:00 UTC >> Symbol period: 24 s >> Characters: 12 >> CRC bits: 14 >> Coding 16K21A >> Duration: 8h, 32m, 0s >> Antenna current: 700 mA >> >> *This is beyond the decode skills of my PC but i assume that many of >> you will have a better system available. Alex has 8 GB RAM at least >> so it will be possible and i stay at 16K21A. >> >> > A Walk in the Park:-) > > 73 Eddie G3ZJO --------------010802040704050104040604 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hello Eddie,

I confirm the message :-)
Thanks for the feedback, always good to know the message went out as expected.

BTW it is useful to run the decode process until it is completed (= 25%,  at 30 deg steps) because there can be better results, with another phase combination which gives a better Eb/N0. The best result is always interesting because then we know how far we are from the limit...

It looks like the QRN was relatively high last night.

73, Stefan

Am 27.02.2017 09:15, schrieb g3zjo:

Good decode of the 12 Chr. message in Northampton UK IO92ng. Message XXXXXXXXXXXX PM sent to HQ for confirmation.

found XXXXXXXXXXXX
list rank 1005
reference phase   30   30   30   30
carrier RMS 4.796e-005 noise RMS 6.007e-006
carrier S/N 18.04 dB in 24.6 uHz
carrier Es/N0 -14.25 dB
carrier Eb/N0 -0.31 dB
info bit period 595.09 seconds
symbol error rate 668/1696 = 39.387 %
Es/N0 from symbol errors -14.4 dB
Eb/N0 from symbol errors -0.5 dB
Shannon capacity 8.0 bits/hour
Shannon efficiency 75.8 %
elapsed 55 seconds


On 26/02/2017 11:03, DK7FC wrote:

f = 8270.100000 Hz
Start time: Sunday 26.Feb.2017   18:00:00 UTC
Symbol period: 24 s
Characters: 12
CRC bits: 14
Coding 16K21A
Duration: 8h, 32m, 0s
Antenna current: 700 mA

This is beyond the decode skills of my PC but i assume that many of you will have a better system available. Alex has 8 GB RAM at least so it will be possible and i stay at 16K21A.


A Walk in the Park:-)

73 Eddie G3ZJO
--------------010802040704050104040604--