Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on lipkowski.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 X-Spam-DCC: : mailn 1480; Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 Received: from post.thorcom.com (post.thorcom.com [195.171.43.25]) by lipkowski.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u1) with ESMTP id v15Jlscv027818 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:47:55 +0100 Received: from majordom by post.thorcom.com with local (Exim 4.14) id 1caSjQ-00079g-AZ for rs_out_1@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 19:44:16 +0000 Received: from [195.171.43.32] (helo=relay1.thorcom.net) by post.thorcom.com with esmtp (Exim 4.14) id 1caSjP-00079X-UI for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 19:44:15 +0000 Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]) by relay1.thorcom.net with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1caSjM-0001bv-CS for rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org; Sun, 05 Feb 2017 19:44:14 +0000 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A804020B26 for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:44:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 3vGgyz1zWRzyrH for ; Sun, 5 Feb 2017 20:44:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <5897808B.4000004@posteo.de> Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2017 20:44:11 +0100 From: DK7FC User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org References: <159c6d4aa99-2cc9-11356@webprd-m36.mail.aol.com> <5884E0D8.1090102@abelian.org> <5885FBEE.3060408@posteo.de> <58861BDF.8010605@posteo.de> <58875792.7020302@posteo.de> <58879804.7010301@abelian.org> <5887ACEB.2000207@posteo.de> <5888EEDA.6070308@abelian.org> <588DE1EE.3050408@posteo.de> <588E25B1.8010009@abelian.org> <58959847.4060104@posteo.de> <3f354814-4211-b5b2-c957-a5ad9c988d96@abelian.org> In-Reply-To: <3f354814-4211-b5b2-c957-a5ad9c988d96@abelian.org> X-Scan-Signature: b77892ad90d0261eaf071f4f6cf31464 Subject: Re: ULF: 5 wavelengths on 2970 Hz (?) | No 8270 from here today Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes Sender: owner-rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: rsgb_lf_group@blacksheep.org X-Listname: rsgb_lf_group X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: rs_out_1@blacksheep.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No; SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.75 Status: O X-Status: X-Keywords: X-UID: 10493 Am 05.02.2017 17:31, schrieb Paul Nicholson: > Not significant: if I do a wide spectrum there are plenty > of peaks of similar or greater height. But it counts as > 'interesting' because it's on the right frequency. Hmm, plenty of peaks, sure, but not plenty of dashes, sharp dashes of high SNR (white colour in the spectrum at http://www.webalice.it/rromero/live_cumiana/last-LFtest_2970.jpg ) which start exactly on the expected time and frequency. The latest pixel is not so strong unfortunately, probably due to QRN. But i bet the next ones will be, again. And i bet the dash will end right after one week, just a dash between two time makers. I intend to transmit one week exactly. And i increased the antenna current to 170 mA a few hours ago. Yesterday it was quite stormy and rainy and i transmitted anyway. Today, a visual inspection showed no sign of HV stress, again, so things may be less critical than expected. 150 mA to 170 mA, that's 1 dB at least. From the early LF times we learned to read the weakest signals in QRSS or DFCW. The complete spectrogram means information. And the peak hold graph in the spectrum (green) shows that there only 3 peaks which have the same strength or a higher strength. And these peaks are rather blotches :-) Anyway, a higher significance is desirable, thus i will run the transmission a few days longer. Then we will see if its confirmed. A frequency step will of course help even more to get a clear ID, but that takes serveral days more then. So, we will see... 73, Stefan